THE TRUMP 2024 THREAD

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You keep talking about the "regime". Just exactly who is the "regime"? The so called "Deep State" the existence of which nobody can accurately describe or support their claims of it's existence with corroborated proof?
When a party talks of stacking SCOTUS, talks of creating two new states to benefit it, lets millions of potential voters into the country illegally, sends storm troopers to arrest old men and abortion protesters while telling U.S. Marshalls to not arrest protesters outside of SCOTUS homes even though they're in clear violation of Federal law, discusses classifying parents who protest at school board meetings as domestic terrorists, I think it's fair to at the very least call that party and their administration a regime. With a clear authoritarian bent. Now please justify all of that so we can see your authoritarian side come out.
 

UnionStrong

Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
Dershowitz is full-on MAGA. What else would you expect from him?
5A61CCCF-5905-4826-A07E-C4904ADA1417.gif
 

Jkloc420

Do you need an air compressor or tire gauge
You keep talking about the "regime". Just exactly who is the "regime"? The so called "Deep State" the existence of which nobody can accurately describe or support their claims of it's existence with corroborated proof?
The party behind the presidency, the people who pull the strings, you either do what they say or they screw you over, they killed jfk, mlk, and toppled a lot of governments
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Maybe we can’t say with 100% certainty. However, if there isn’t a higher institution, or group of people, let’s just call them the deep state. If there isn’t a deep state, then why is it that all of our mainstream news organizations repeat the same lies and why do all but one want liberals to be elected into all offices? Btw I am not a Fox News fan simply because I think they are working with all the other news agencies just to be there to make conservatives think someone is on their side, they are not. They are there to simply cause division among the people. Go back to the pledge of allegiance, “and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, INDIVISIBLE, with liberty, and justice for all.” The deep state hates America, they want us divided so they can conquer us, for whatever reason. Our news agencies are deciding our elections to get unamerican politicians into office to destroy the United States of America and everything we used to stand for. For whatever reason, it really doesn’t matter. What’s important is that you are able to see it happening.
After all this you still have not identified just exactly who the "Deep State" actually is. Nor have you identified any of the people who are alleged to be members of the "Deep State" or any evidence that ties them to the "Deep State" And just who is the so called "regime"?

Now some people might have confused 'Deep State" with intelligence deep operatives we have stationed all over the world. And a number of them are today hiding in plain sight. Their job is to protect American interests... not undermine them.
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
After all this you still have not identified just exactly who the "Deep State" actually is. Nor have you identified any of the people who are alleged to be members of the "Deep State" or any evidence that ties them to the "Deep State" And just who is the so called "regime"?

Now some people might have confused 'Deep State" with intelligence deep operatives we have stationed all over the world. And a number of them are today hiding in plain sight. Their job is to protect American interests... not undermine them.
It doesn’t matter who they are, just that there is one.
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
Deep state:

Comey declined to prosecute Hillary Clinton on her email scandal despite finding that she violated federal rules and handled classified material “carelessly.”

He declared, “Ethical leaders lead by seeing above the short term, above the urgent or the partisan, and with a higher loyalty to lasting values, most importantly the truth.”

Yet now Comey is heralding the effort of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who campaigned on a pledge of bagging Trump for some unspecified crime.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
The party behind the presidency, the people who pull the strings, you either do what they say or they screw you over, they killed jfk, mlk, and toppled a lot of governments
And just exactly WHO is that PARTY now you have gone from "regime" to "party".
And JFK? A lot of people made a lot of money selling JFK books and movie rights. Including Norman Mailer and if you've been observant of what's going on you would know the game old Norm played.

Thank God, Gerald Posner finally put the JFK and MLK assassinations to bed years ago and that's why we haven't heard anything more about them since.
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
And just exactly WHO is that PARTY now you have gone from "regime" to "party".
And JFK? A lot of people made a lot of money selling JFK books and movie rights. Including Norman Mailer and if you've been observant of what's going on you would know the game old Norm played.

Thank God, Gerald Posner finally put the JFK and MLK assassinations to bed years ago and that's why we haven't heard anything more about them since.
Lollll that’s rich!
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
If the existence of it cannot be confirmed or located or identified then the boogeyman is living free of charge in the minds of conspiracy theory lovers everywhere.
How so? So comey found that Hillary keeping classified emails on her server wasn’t anything to prosecute a former First Lady for is ok, yet the fbi had the right to raid trumps house because of classified documents he had at his house is justified. And indicting him over having sex with a porn start is justified?
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
And just exactly WHO is that PARTY now you have gone from "regime" to "party".
And JFK? A lot of people made a lot of money selling JFK books and movie rights. Including Norman Mailer and if you've been observant of what's going on you would know the game old Norm played.

Thank God, Gerald Posner finally put the JFK and MLK assassinations to bed years ago and that's why we haven't heard anything more about them since.
People would have sold those books writing anything about jfk regardless of what happened. He was one of the most loved presidents of our time. And for good reason, he was pro america. Any wonder the deep state had him killed.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
When a party talks of stacking SCOTUS, talks of creating two new states to benefit it, lets millions of potential voters into the country illegally, sends storm troopers to arrest old men and abortion protesters while telling U.S. Marshalls to not arrest protesters outside of SCOTUS homes even though they're in clear violation of Federal law, discusses classifying parents who protest at school board meetings as domestic terrorists, I think it's fair to at the very least call that party and their administration a regime. With a clear authoritarian bent. Now please justify all of that so we can see your authoritarian side come out.
(1). SCOTUS: According to Mitch O'Connell the death of Scalia 237 days before the election was too close to the election to confirm a new SCOTUS nominee. BUT When RBG dies 79 days before the election to confirm that wasn't too close to confirm a new SCOTUS nominee. I challenge you to explain why 237 days was too close to the election but 79 days wasn't too close to the election . (2) They can't vote until they are naturalized citizens. And BTW exactly what year did the most illegal border crossings occur....2005...(3)Protesters in the DC area have to apply for protest permits , meet all requirements and abide by those requirements. If they have a permit and fully abide by those terms and requirements on what grounds can you arrest them for? And when it comes to unopposed violent behavior how convenient it was for you to willfully ignore 1-06.

And like others on here you allege that the Biden Administration is a "regime" without defining what a regime is and provide corroborated proof that the Biden Administration is operating as one.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
How so? So comey found that Hillary keeping classified emails on her server wasn’t anything to prosecute a former First Lady for is ok, yet the fbi had the right to raid trumps house because of classified documents he had at his house is justified. And indicting him over having sex with a porn start is justified?
The difference? The FBI had a federal warrant.
 

Non liberal

Well-Known Member
(1). SCOTUS: According to Mitch O'Connell the death of Scalia 237 days before the election was too close to the election to confirm a new SCOTUS nominee. BUT When RBG dies 79 days before the election to confirm that wasn't too close to confirm a new SCOTUS nominee. I challenge you to explain why 237 days was too close to the election but 79 days wasn't too close to the election . (2) They can't vote until they are naturalized citizens. And BTW exactly what year did the most illegal border crossings occur....2005...(3)Protesters in the DC area have to apply for protest permits , meet all requirements and abide by those requirements. If they have a permit and fully abide by those terms and requirements on what grounds can you arrest them for? And when it comes to unopposed violent behavior how convenient it was for you to willfully ignore 1-06.

And like others on here you allege that the Biden Administration is a "regime" without defining what a regime is and provide corroborated proof that the Biden Administration is operating as one.
Oh yes, im sure BLM had all the necessary permits to protest. Nary a one sitting in jail for longer than a week! Next?
 
Top