Trump accuses Jon Stewart of "racist rant" in Cain segment - Yahoo! News
Oh so now, questioning Zer0's BC is racist? Nawwww, not buying that BS.It was a play on words joke. It's only "racist" because Stewart is a Liberal. Trump is a maroon, which he proved (once again) last week when he tried to bring Rick Perry aboard the Birther Bus. The "racist rant" is actually very funny. Do you like Black Walnuts?
Probably not, but take it context with the emphasis on "Barak HUSSEIN Obama", the absurd "socialist" charges, and the ridiculously weak support the GOP has with minorities, and...well, how do you not question racism?Oh so now, questioning Zer0's BC is racist? Nawwww, not buying that BS.
Probably not, but take it context with the emphasis on "Barak HUSSEIN Obama", the absurd "socialist" charges, and the ridiculously weak support the GOP has with minorities, and...well, how do you not question racism?
Sometimes connecting the dots does not draw a realistic picture.I'm not trying to convince anyone that someone is racist. What I am saying is that with the historical backdrop of our history, it's not hard to connect those dots.
But "realit" can mean anything and can be skewed by ones own history. That doesn't mean it's the "race card", just that in our culture it is not hard to question.Sometimes connecting the dots does not draw a realistic picture.
Still would like to know what you mean by GOP/minority support.
Reality is what it is, how someone see's it can be skewed by their history. But reality can be skewed by rhetoric from "trusted" (for lack of a better word) sources giving false or twisted versions of reality.But "realit" can mean anything and can be skewed by ones own history. That doesn't mean it's the "race card", just that in our culture it is not hard to question.
As to the other, I think both fit.
It may be hard to do, but to dismiss all such inquiries as "playing the race card" isn't fair either, is it?Reality is what it is, how someone see's it can be skewed by their history. But reality can be skewed by rhetoric from "trusted" (for lack of a better word) sources giving false or twisted versions of reality.
In today's society, IMO, to question a statement as racist of and by it's self is very hard to do. The motive and the person making the statement have to be considered as well.
It may be hard to do, but to dismiss all such inquiries as "playing the race card" isn't fair either, is it?
Who has been shut down? If anything it's stirred more dialogue. It may only be back and forth and get nowhere, but would you have nothing said? Who then is looking to "demean" and "shut down"? When something is called "racist", then both sides should be able to discuss why or why not. Republicans right now are calling the scrutiny of the Cain situation racist and "high-tech" lynching. Really? Where is the racism? Or is the right, as you claim, simply trying to shut down the scrutiny of the republican front runner?An inquiry is not what I would always consider "playing the race card", it depends on how it is asked and the subsequent text, also in many situations who is asking. When a statement starts out with " That's racist" it's playing the card. When the question is asked if it was racist, then maybe not but still carries the sting of the card. IMO, when the claim of racism is attributed to an entire group, it isn't only incorrect but is intended to somehow demean the individuals in that group and to shut down all dialog. And that is not fair. That is certainly not debate.
Who has been shut down? If anything it's stirred more dialogue. It may only be back and forth and get nowhere, but would you have nothing said? Who then is looking to "demean" and "shut down"? When something is called "racist", then both sides should be able to discuss why or why not. Republicans right now are calling the scrutiny of the Cain situation racist and "high-tech" lynching. Really? Where is the racism? Or is the right, as you claim, simply trying to shut down the scrutiny of the republican front runner?
GO DONALD! Show us how ridiculously stupid you really are!!
You gotta love those youtube videos. I am sooooo glad he wasn't doing those in the eighties. I would have died laughing a few times.
so this doofus announced hes running for prez. i think his shows are cheap entertainment and part of the system of control. my guess is he will be a terrible prez but may be better than some of the other republicans.
a vote for the least evil is still evil.