New Englander
Well-Known Member
Not trying to argue, but curious - name one.
Must we list the various and plentiful local assembly jobs that can be found ANYWHERE in the entire country that have a lower starting pay then UPS?
Not trying to argue, but curious - name one.
Oh, heck, sorry - I speak only of the $8.50/hour unloader working the 3am - 9am shift. It's still fresh with me - if there is a hell, I imagine that is what it is like, but less chance of being killed by 110lb irregulars stacked on the top of the row by sadistic loaders.
I started in 1986 as a part timer for $8/hr. Benefits followed shortly there after. 30-60 days, I don't remember. That was good money then. Frankly at the time I didn't care less about the benefits. I was in college and still on my parents benefits as well as being "immortal". UPS targeted college kids and it was a good fit. Now 22 years later they are offering $8.50 to start with no benefits for a year. So now who are they targeting? They are getting exactly what they deserve and pay for, substandard employees. The majority realize in a short time that it isn't worth it. It's only going to get worse as the contract calls for no increases throughout 2013.
Whether we like it or not UPS and the Teamsters let down the backbone of our operation, the part time employee. We will all pay a price ultimately for selfishly voting in what is becoming an increasingly obvious poor contract. Unfortunately these part timers didn't realize the power their vote carries. Their vast numbers could have easily changed the face of the contract had they mobilized. Who's fault is that? All of ours. Who will pay the price? We all will. We already are.
Is there an easier UPS position then unloader? You put a box on a roller.....over and over and over. You honestly think that position is worth more then $8.50 an hour starting wage at part-time?
What responsibility do you have other then to show up and maybe try to keep labels up?
Care to expound on that?For some strange reason you guys honestly think higher pay equates into better employee's. It just does not happen. Look at the driver/feeder ranks, there are some real slugs there as well.
The Union loves part-time turnover. You guys need to understand that.
Is there an easier UPS position then unloader? You put a box on a roller.....over and over and over. You honestly think that position is worth more then $8.50 an hour starting wage at part-time?
What responsibility do you have other then to show up and maybe try to keep labels up?
Care to expound on that?
Must we list the various and plentiful local assembly jobs that can be found ANYWHERE in the entire country that have a lower starting pay then UPS?
For some strange reason you guys honestly think higher pay equates into better employee's. It just does not happen. Look at the driver/feeder ranks, there are some real slugs there as well.
The Union loves part-time turnover. You guys need to understand that.
Spoken like someone who has OBVIOUSLY never done it. Don't insult us by saying you did - you didn't. Because if you had ever unloaded, you would know how utterly stupid the above quoted text you wrote is.
Spoken like someone who has never done anything but work FOR someone else. Higher pay unquestionaly attracts better people - if you don't believe that, you are simply clueless.
Now that UPS starts unloaders at $8.50 and benefits don't kick in for a year, I really cannot understand why anyone would start their career at UPS. The vast majority of people who used to accept positions at UPS to do the brutal, physical work did so because A) After 3 months they got benefits that enhanced whatever REAL job they had, or B)They had dreams to move thru the ranks to become a driver.
I started a few months prior to the new contract, so I have my benefits. I never would have considered the position of unloader at $8.50/hour if I had to wait a year to kick in - there are FAR too many easier jobs that pay much better.
I have no doubt whatsoever (mark this on your calander) that regardless of what the labor contract states, you will see UPS raise its' starting rate, kick the benefits back in at 3 months instead of 12, or both within the next year.
...Are you confusing the physicality of the job translating to it's wage level? .....
Must we list the various and plentiful local assembly jobs that can be found ANYWHERE in the entire country that have a lower starting pay then UPS?
If you wanted to go full time at UPS you would have considered it regardless. Don't even try to tell me otherwise.
If I were a single man, I would agree with you (much to my displeasure).
As I am married with children, I confirm what I said - if I knew I had to wait a year for benefits, I would not, could not, have considered the job at $8.50/hour. That is the complete and honest truth.
Confusing it? No. Rightfully equating & linking the two? Of course.
Are you telling me in comparing two jobs, both being equal, but one much more physically demanding than the other, that they should both pay the same?
We talking managment or hourlies here? Two VERY different sets of reasons.