DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Nice deflection.In this country? White supremacists. Easy.
Nice deflection.In this country? White supremacists. Easy.
Not at all. You tried to redefine the conversation in a ridiculous fashion. I brought it back on topic.Nice deflection.
I was pointing out that violence is not always unjustified.Nice deflection.
I was simply pointing out your ridiculous comparison of antifa to slave rebellions.
Carry on.
You justified antifa violence by comparing it to slave rebellions, and I'm the one being ridiculous?Not at all. You tried to redefine the conversation in a ridiculous fashion. I brought it back on topic.
Not at all, love to see those Communists get a good beat down.I was pointing out that violence is not always unjustified.
Do you disagree?
I understand what you're saying...that you allow yourself to make broad statements that you do not allow to be narrowly focused, but that you do not extend that same consideration to the President.People in houses and working at regular jobs?
Yes.
An White Nationalist fk running down people with his car?
No.
Idiots chanting “You will not replace us!”...
No.
So, in answer to your query, not so much.
There are good people everywhere, but the s marching in Charlottesville were wannabe White Nationalist fks.
Sorry if that wasn’t the answer you wanted.
I understand what you're saying...that you allow yourself to make broad statements that you do not allow to be narrowly focused, but that you do not extend that same consideration to the President.
Thanks for clarifying.
You see, there is a fundamental problem with what you are saying.
You are saying that Nat Turner was wrong to lead a violent slave rebellion.
You are saying that the civil rights movement was ok for MLK’s brand but not for Malcolm X.
That civil disobedience is ok but violence against oppression is not.
friend that.
Is violence ever justified?
Have white supremacy groups been historically violent?
Go ahead. Be honest. We know it’ll be painful for you but that’s just the healing.
No, I did not. Antifa isn't using violence against oppression. They're using violence against anyone who disagrees with their point of view. They are the oppressors. They are the fascists.You see, there is a fundamental problem with what you are saying.
You are saying that Nat Turner was wrong to lead a violent slave rebellion.
You are saying that the civil rights movement was ok for MLK’s brand but not for Malcolm X.
That civil disobedience is ok but violence against oppression is not.
friend that.
He's already said that if everyone can't participate equally in society then it should all be torn down. But does resist giving his drivers more pay if it means coming out of his pocket to do so. Very conflicted man.one justfies the other?
So Antifa is justified in attacking a law abiding person exercising his right to protest because some racist cracker lynched a person of color years ago?
where are you going with this insane logic?
Can you consider that the statues they wanted to tear down were of men born into that system, not the architects of the system? We look at it as despicable now yet those are the very same men who laid the framework for the system that today gives rights and freedoms that were unprecedented in world history. We aren't perfect but a study of U.S. history shows us marching towards a better world for everyone. The difference today is how we get there. Do we earn it, or do we allow government to regulate every aspect of our lives in exchange for "security?" The Antifa people want government control, and seem to believe intimidation through violence will achieve their goals.No. Slavery = oppression.
Hard for you to fathom that?
I was pointing out that violence is not always unjustified.
Do you disagree?
Lol. “They didn’t know slavery was wrong! It was just a system they were born into!”Can you consider that the statues they wanted to tear down were of men born into that system, not the architects of the system? We look at it as despicable now yet those are the very same men who laid the framework for the system that today gives rights and freedoms that were unprecedented in world history. We aren't perfect but a study of U.S. history shows us marching towards a better world for everyone. The difference today is how we get there. Do we earn it, or do we allow government to regulate every aspect of our lives in exchange for "security?" The Antifa people want government control, and seem to believe intimidation through violence will achieve their goals.
Slavery was lawful. Violence not justified?in a lawful society yes
The irony here is that if your words had been spoken by Trump, you would be screaming for his head.I was pointing out that violence is not always unjustified.
Do you disagree?
Lol, you're still comparing antifa to slave rebellions. Get a grip!Slavery was lawful. Violence not justified?
The irony is that you support it when Trump says it and cry like a snowflake when I ask the question.The irony here is that if your words had been spoken by Trump, you would be screaming for his head.
No. The question is when is violence acceptable and when is it not. Ttku.Lol, you're still comparing antifa to slave rebellions. Get a grip!