MassWineGuy
Well-Known Member
I read here that in Denver FedEx is paying $2.50 an hour in addition to regular wages as incentive pay. Memphis had this, too. Is it happening elsewhere?
I read here that in Denver FedEx is paying $2.50 an hour in addition to regular wages as incentive pay. Memphis had this, too. Is it happening elsewhere?
Where?My market has had $3/hour extra since last april.
ColumbusWhere?
And what market are you in?What’s the step 5 rate?
Gee, how do the 15 yr employees at step 5 feel about that?We’re the base market level so looks like 21.76
And try to do so without deviating, bloviating, or obfuscating, please.Let's ask @59 Dano exactly what would be the answer from Memphis if not all, just 51% of all couriers, handlers, and csa's in markets or stations that do not get the incentive refuse to report for work on the same day, nationwide?
It seems to me that is the complete rationale for putting express under the RLA.
@59 Dano, what would X's response be and which entity has the authority to order these non-compliant slackers to report for work?
Essentially wouldn't Fedex be doing the same thing the RLA seeks to protect them from if they don't address the concerns of the call-outs? It's not like there is no remedy under the RLA.
@59 Dano, what is Express's response and what remedy is available through statuatory and administrative law?
I'm a work in progress.And try to do so without deviating, bloviating, or obfuscating, please.
I don't know what exactly the answer from Memphis would be to your stupid hypothetical premise. My guess is that they'd say "This sucks."Let's ask @59 Dano exactly what would be the answer from Memphis if not all, just 51% of all couriers, handlers, and csa's in markets or stations that do not get the incentive refuse to report for work on the same day, nationwide?
Jim in accounting.It seems to me that is the complete rationale for putting express under the RLA.
@59 Dano, what would X's response be and which entity has the authority to order these non-compliant slackers to report for work?
I'm not trying to be rude (well not with this part of the post) but do you have issues organizing your thoughts and expressing them clearly? "What remedy is available through statutory and administrative law?" To whom? For what????Essentially wouldn't Fedex be doing the same thing the RLA seeks to protect them from if they don't address the concerns of the call-outs? It's not like there is no remedy under the RLA.
@59 Dano, what is Express's response and what remedy is available through statuatory and administrative law?
It's obvious it would suck, even you can figure that out. That said, how would they respond? That is an answer. I'll draw you a picture if you need it.I don't know what exactly the answer from Memphis would be to your stupid hypothetical premise. My guess is that they'd say "This sucks."
Jim in accounting most likely has a hard time ordering at Chick-fil-a. He can't order anything.Jim in accounting.
That is the purpose of the RLA, to settle labor disagreements."What remedy is available through statutory and administrative law?" To whom? For what????
At times I do have trouble organizing my thoughts. Then there are times I hook and draw a person in, idiots gift, that's how I like to define it."What remedy is available through statutory and administrative law?" To whom? For what????
A bunch of people skip work. Does one side have a legal option to retaliate with? No.
I have no idea where you're going with any of this and have no interest in trying to decipher cryptic messages. I try my best to answer whatever is asked of me but your stuff is oddball crap, either because you don't know any better or because you like to think you're being clever or something.It's obvious it would suck, even you can figure that out. That said, how would they respond? That is an answer. I'll draw you a picture if you need it.
Jim in accounting most likely has a hard time ordering at Chick-fil-a. He can't order anything.
Non responsive to the question asked.
Jim in accounting can deny pay however.
That is the purpose of the RLA, to settle labor disagreements.
Will Fedex just walk away and watch their hub-n-spoke airline fail?
At times I do have trouble organizing my thoughts. Then there are times I hook and draw a person in, idiots gift, that's how I like to define it.
Under the language of the RLA I'll give you the opportunity to answer this question for yourself.
I do thank you for not being rude and highlighting my ignorance and lack of legal reasoning.
We agree on one thing however,
It is a hypothetical. For only one reason, nutless employees. If they find anything in the sack one day we can revisit this post and the numerous times we have spoken.