Oh geeeez Tie, relax just a little. What difference does it make? The fact is you and a few others on this board are very quick to jump on a new poster as a Troll or say they are lying or not telling the whole story or holding back important information. But it's funny that the only times you do it is when the post puts management in a bad light. I'm pretty sure that either of us could look up old posts and come to some % to prove or disprove the % claims, but what difference does it make? I mean really, what differance? For one thing I know from experience if I did show where you accused a % of posters to be trolls, you either ignore it or try to spin a lie around it, so what's the point?
You know usually this is the point where I am tempted to say I'm sorry if I offended you, but I really just don't care. You sure don't mind offending other people, so what comes around...yadda, yadda, yadda.
And as for you last sentence in you pathetic attempt to dance around a spicific question I asked you, why try to drag someone else into the "fray"?
The question, if you don't remember, is "Is there a problem with the info the alleged troll posted? Is it true or is it false?".