Why is it so hard for you to call it what it is. A camera.You mean the management Has to go out and physically see it? So it’s not a camera? So it’s just like telematics? So you’re a complete fool?
How do you even get through life?
Again, if the sensor is currently active file, a grievance stick a sticky note over the sensor they have no recourse.
Feeder Inward Sensor
- Thread starter brown67
- Start date
They used the camera to discipline you. By knowing where you were most likely to do something. Duh. Come on George you can do better then this.You mean the management Has to go out and physically see it? So it’s not a camera? So it’s just like telematics? So you’re a complete fool?
How do you even get through life?
Again, if the sensor is currently active file, a grievance stick a sticky note over the sensor they have no recourse.
I bet you don't even know why the cell phone companies have stopped calling camera's,"camera's", and now call them censors.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Why do they need to come watch you? They have video right? let’s just watch the video. Obviously they have it according to you. The company cannot directly use technology to fire you, but they obviously use it to pinpoint people. For example, if you’re not wearing your seatbelt and telematics, shows that they’re going to come out and see you. Then they can terminate you, this isn’t rocket science buddy again where is all this video? And why aren’t they using it? I can assure you I’m involved in every step of the process of discipline not once have I seen inward facing camera video regardless of what the little green people on Mars are telling you.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Who is forcing you to have a smart phone with a camera? Tell us! This is awful you’re being forced.
Once a management person, always a management person. Don't you think once the little guys moving the boxes figure out how you management people are using the cameras. That a lot of them at that point would remove/ go after the company for deceptive practices.
The actual word that is used in law doesn't come to mind just at thai second, but in general the company doesn't want anyone to know that they are using them due to the implications. As in keep the lie going..so go ahead and respond. I'm waiting for your management response.
So you have no idea why they moved to the word sensor?
Brown Circus
Shh...It’s peak and I’m hunting logic
Girls, girls, your both pretty!
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Lol I really don’t have time to discuss real issues with someone whose brain is fried. I’m not in management genius I represent people if there was a video they would’ve showed it to me there’s none because they don’t record video. And they can no longer even use the sensor on the inside, so what now what grand conspiracy theories you have, since you’ve made a complete and total fool of yourself. Which through most of our interactions is what you normally do.
And it’s interesting you think management is somehow genius, most of them haven’t got a clue what the hell they’re talking about much less are they able to hide anything.
You’re simply spreading misinformation or you’re a complete liar I don’t know what you’re doing, but both are doing no one favors.
Pull up some inward-facing camera video for me from the UPS package car. I’ll be waiting.
Censors are allowed in restrooms and bathrooms. Cameras are not. Legal hogwash.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
What does that have to do with package cars? you’re making no sense as usual.
Isn’t it time to go watch X-Files?
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
Dang read the highlighted sentence. Uuhh deerrr..
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
And? Still waiting for that camera footage.
If I were you, I would be more worried about all the cameras on everyone’s house, and the city cameras, as well as customers, cell phone cameras, and video. because I’ve seen more people fired for Whats recorded on those. There’s no language about those in our contract.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
And when are they presenting this evidence in hearings, and panels, what good would that do them?
Here is my biggest problem with what you are saying. You are telling people you are fighting for them, and are telling the people you are fighting for that it is all right to have your phone out texting someone while driving. Due to they can't use this video in the meetings.
Thebrownblob
Well-Known Member
I don’t think I said anything about texting while driving. That is an unwise choice by the driver. and yes, I’m saying the company can’t use video because it clearly says that in the contract not to mention they’re not recording video in the cab. if they see you doing it in person that’s a different story. it’s really not hard it just takes proper representation. We had a similar situation with unscanned packages. The company was claiming the driver return to the building and packages were supposedly scanned on his truck that we’re not delivered they did not have the package and management did not physically see the package. guess what we didn’t agree to this one because that’s using technology only. Driving and get caught texting and driving in person and bringing packages back to the building without scans physically found on the trucks, are subject to the discipline procedure.
Drivers would be smart to never do those things. That way they never have to worry about Supervisor’s doing audits in person on them will be in plenty good practice of doing the right thing.
Last edited:
