You should try her spaghetti. The more you eat, the hungrier you get!...LMAOView attachment 12751 Watch out mom lol.
Lol i could say the same thing about....something else...lolYou should try her spaghetti. The more you eat, the hungrier you get!...LMAO
How'd you explain the fifth of whiskey in your other pocket? lmaoHey! I was running home,so my Mom could make spaghetti sauce. Thats my story . and im sticking with it!
It is safer in a bunch of ways...the biggest prob is how long in stays in your system. Smoke a joint...dirty piss for a month5 beers= DUI You aint smoking 5 joints by yourself amigo. First of all your wasting the product like an idiot and second of all you smoking 5 joints you definitely got some of your boys over sharing the wealth lmfao and no DUI. Once again an example of its definitely safer to smoke than to drink.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/marijuana-legalization-just-failed-ohio-035403549.htmlHooray for Ohio !!! Thanks buckeyes for voting common sense!!! No pot.........good choice!!
Yeah, monopolies are taboo too....two to one was the margin of victory. Now the growers can go get a regular job. ...or buy a lottery ticket for their instant fortune..http://finance.yahoo.com/news/marijuana-legalization-just-failed-ohio-035403549.html
Marijuana legalization just failed in Ohio — and it may have nothing to do with attitudes about legalization
One of those growers is Nick Lachey.Yeah, monopolies are taboo too....two to one was the margin of victory. Now the growers can go get a regular job. ...or buy a lottery ticket for their instant fortune..
I know....it was him I was referring to the most....get a job, actor-boy!!!One of those growers is Nick Lachey.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/marijuana-legalization-just-failed-ohio-035403549.html
Marijuana legalization just failed in Ohio — and it may have nothing to do with attitudes about legalization
The rejection, however, may have less to do with Ohioans attitudes about marijuana than one might think.
The proposal, known as Issue 3, allowed adults 21 and older to use, purchase, and grow certain amounts of marijuana and established a regulatory and taxation scheme to handle the legalization.
Embedded in the proposal, however, was a stipulation that would have given "exclusive rights" for commercial marijuana growth, cultivation, and extraction to 10 predetermined parcels of land.
The various owners of those land parcels were the proponents and funders of the initiative, known as Responsible Ohio. The group spent more than $12 million on ads, and The New York Times reports that its members spent $25 million on the campaign in total.
The problems voters may have had with Issue 3 were best summed up by Case Western University School of Law professor Jonathan Adler in The Washington Post:
Issue 3 would create a marijuana "monopoly" (actually, an oligopoly) consisting of 10 producers who would have their exclusive rights to engage in the commercial production of marijuana enshrined in the state constitution. The campaign in support of Issue 3 — so-called Responsible Ohio — is predictably supported by those who would hold these exclusive rights. This is crony capitalism at its worst.
They do not have to work ... if those 10 people can put up $25 million, they do not work in the normal sense and don't have too.Yeah, monopolies are taboo too....two to one was the margin of victory. Now the growers can go get a regular job. ...or buy a lottery ticket for their instant fortune..
my government announced yesterday that in 2017 pot is legal in canada
my government announced yesterday that in 2017 pot is legal in canada