dannyboy
From the promised LAND
nope, you are right. it makes him guilty. thats why they brought him back to workI believe this is what may have been ruled, but that does not make him INNOCENT
i am not dealing with emotion and tears as you so eloquently suggest. i am taking the cold hard facts as they have been presented here, and drawn my conclusions from them
There is "innocent until proven guilty" language in our NMA, and maybe the company just did not have enough to convince the panel that the termination met this standard.
yup, that pesky little part of our rights under the constitution. innocent until proven guilty. problem is, you seem to think the other way around. he is guilty of theft, without any proof to back it up. the company had the time to process all the information it had, it could have, if they felt it important enough, to have the state authorities investigate further if their abilities were not sufficient.
but they did not. so either the proof into the charge of theft by this employee did not exist, or they were too damn lazy to uncover it. my guess is the first.
so, under the constitution and the contract, the company failed to prove its charges to a reasonable degree of certainty, therefore they had to let him go back to work. which is the way it should be. you are Innocent until it is proven you are guilty.
kinda funny, so many of the ones that would argue about the guilt of this guy, and how he should be in jail are the same ones that would argue that the guys in gitmo are just innocents on their way to get married or out with the guys on a family vacation.
you are forgetting the simple concept of due process. and until his day in court, he is Innocent until proven guilty of felony theft. that is also why we have the executions after the trials instead of before them.
now, if you are bent on making examples of a industry that would impact theft, lets arrest every one that owns or works at a pawn shop, flea market, used goods stores, ebay, etc. without the mass ability to turn goods into cash, theives would not steal, right? so regardless of guilt or inocence, but to make a statement, lets just take them all to jail without a trial or hearing because they are all guilty.
yes, that does make a lot of sense.
d