realbrown1
Annoy a liberal today. Hit them with facts.
I guess that's all you have to say anymore.Bollocks.
You don't even have to read my posts anymore, if you ever did.
I guess that's all you have to say anymore.Bollocks.
I guess that's all you have to say anymore.
You don't even have to read my posts anymore, if you ever did.
Because that doesn't fit the narrative that they want to feed us.
The guns are bad, and bad people are not.
I was asking you.
If these occurrences happen so often, even the 'Liberal' media couldn't ignore them.
To flip it, the 'Conservative' media would be trumpeting each and every instance.
Yet, it's just an occurrence here or there.
So, either it's simply a thing that happens randomly, in which case it's not a policy to promote, or both the Liberal and Conservative media are under-reporting all the times that good guys with guns stop bad guys with guns, which doesn't make sense.
What do you think?
From Wikipedia (Defensive gun use - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) Estimates over the number of defensive gun uses vary wildly, depending on the study's definition of a defensive gun use, survey design, population, criteria, time-period studied, and other factors. Low-end estimates are in the range of 55,000 to 80,000 incidents per year, while high end estimates reach of 4.7 million incidents per year.
Correlation does not imply causation, @tonyexpress. I thought you were smarter than thatAlso from your link...
By December 2014, people’s positive impression of guns had grown further to 57 versus 38 percentage points.
Murder Rates have fallen as the percentage of the Adult Population with Permitted Concealed Handguns has Increased.
Permit Holders are extremely Law abiding.
Permit holders on rare occasion violate the law. But in order to truly appreciate
how incredibly rare those problems are one needs to remember that there are
over 12.8 million permit holders in the US. Indeed, it is impossible to think of any
other group in the US who is anywhere near as law abiding.
Thanks for the information.
Correlation does not imply causation, @tonyexpress. I thought you were smarter than that
How so? Care to elucidate?I'm surprised you admitted that. Tell it to the global warming alarmists.
How so? Care to elucidate?
Correlation does not imply causation, @tonyexpress. I thought you were smarter than that
Can you tell me what climate changes do not imply human induced causation?
I disagree.The data only shows possible correlation. Not causation.
A whole 9 minutes?I spent nine minutes with this, and I came up with: NOTHING.
How about the climate change occurring before mankind existed?Can you tell me what climate changes do not imply human induced causation?
How about people obsessed with the freedom and safety of their families?Guns are bad in the hands of bad people. People obsessed with guns are bad, and sick.
How about people obsessed with the freedom and safety of their families?
And do you own a gun?
Correlation does not imply causation, @tonyexpress. I thought you were smarter than that
How about people obsessed with the freedom and safety of their families?
And do you own a gun?