Access Points

Discussion in 'UPS Union Issues' started by sven, May 7, 2015.

  1. sven

    sven New Member

    Yes..its a new "sub-contracting" scheme by the company to stop making the 2nd or 3rd attempt to homes. After the first not in 1 the diad will alert you that the package, depending on availability to your route, and generates an intercept to forward the package to the "access point" the next business day where it will be held for 5 business days for the customer to pickup. The stops can be deli's or shipping stations. Non union employees then make a delivery when the customer picks it up from them. For each package the Access Point business gets 50 cents. Report ANY such Access Points to your local. Its a clear contract violation since it is subcontracting.
    • Like Like x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • List
  2. Old news. And it's not a contract violation. Do you consider the UPS Store to be subcontracting since they aren't owned by UPS?
  3. UpstateNYUPSer

    UpstateNYUPSer Very proud grandfather.

    It is not subcontracting.
  4. brownmonster

    brownmonster Man of Great Wisdom

    A union UPS driver still delivers it. Who cares what happens after that.
  5. pretzel

    pretzel New Member

    We make three attempts our local doesn't let them do it they tried. It's just another way they can milk more production and cut routes.
  6. Dr.Brownz

    Dr.Brownz Well-Known Member

    Our local said no also.
  7. UpstateNYUPSer

    UpstateNYUPSer Very proud grandfather.

    There is no local that can tell the company how to run their business.
  8. upschuck

    upschuck Well-Known Member

    What is the difference between that and Surepost, the mail uses a lot of contractors that are not union.
  9. Dr.Brownz

    Dr.Brownz Well-Known Member

    Ours did. Sorry that your local is a bunch of panzys
  10. ManInBrown

    ManInBrown Well-Known Member

    I want our Post Office work back. It's BULL*%**

    One of the larger size post offices on a route I cover used to get 20-30 a day. Now they get 350-400. We need that work back
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 1
    • List
  11. UpstateNYUPSer

    UpstateNYUPSer Very proud grandfather.

  12. ManInBrown

    ManInBrown Well-Known Member

    Shocker. If we got that work back, you might have to actually put in an 8 hour day. Could you handle that?
  13. Bubblehead

    Bubblehead My Senior Picture

    They most assuredly can, within the constraints of the collective bargaining agreement in place.

    Get some rest and think about it.
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • List
  14. You're assuming we would get that volume, which I doubt we would. Surepost works for shippers because it's cheap and convenient. Nothing stoping them from going usps which is cheaper. We have no leg to stand on.
  15. worldwide

    worldwide Active Member

    How is it subcontracting? The package is delivered on the first delivery attempt. The customer picks it up when they want to.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • List
  16. UnsurePost

    UnsurePost making the unreadable unreadabler

    Yeah, it's usually UPS stores who hold the package. We deliver to UPS store, they now use the "mychoice" delivery point, which UPS makes money on.

    MyChoice or whatever it is, is there to make UPS money....not create jobs.
  17. clean hairy

    clean hairy Well-Known Member

    How long does the Acess Point hold the packages?
    5 Business days, the same as at the Customer Counter?
    If so, we could get the pickups from the Acess Points for the unclaimed items as well.
    COD's cannnot be left at an Acces Point, or it can, and those folks have to collect the COD on it?
  18. worldwide

    worldwide Active Member

    Packages are held for seven calendar days before being returned to the shipper and in that case, a pickup request would be made for the driver to pickup the package and RTS. No CODS allowed at Access Point locations.

  19. Whatbrownwontdoforyou

    Whatbrownwontdoforyou Well-Known Member

    What locals refused access point? And under what article in there supplement were they violated?........just curious because you would think it wouldnt be a local issue