Don't widen it to much, Biden may have to come out of his basement and actually earn a vote.It wasn’t deflection. Simply a widening of the scope of this election
Let's run it past @It will be fine, the premier expert on identifying 'what-aboutism.'More like 'what-aboutism'!
I understand why you choose to travel.Exactly why my 27 yr old stepdaughter sits around all day on her off hours playing video games, watching Netflix, smoking pot and cigarettes, and getting Door Dash delivery of her favorite junk food. Lets her SUV sit in the driveway for weeks and then needs a jump. And if I say anything about her lazy fat ass her mama bear mother is all over me. Sheesh!!
He's retired. When do you plan on retiring?Where do you work again? Ah. Yes. That’s right.
You call it right influences, I call it a hard weekend with 'Mr. Toby.'![]()
She just needs the right influences in her life...
Give the dims control of the two legislative bodies and the presidency, then come talk to me.but nobody thinks it's ever going to be implemented the way it is written.
I believe I am just the right influence for her.You call it right influences, I call it a hard weekend with 'Mr. Toby.'
She's cute but deadly.
I disagree, she is just too vocal. The party can only be honest to a point on their vision without losing older voters.
Just my opinion, run it by @Box Ox.
He's a dim and I think he has some scruples.
Give the dims control of the two legislative bodies and the presidency, then come talk to me.
You better take this seriously.
Bill Clinton would disagree.Bernie got smashed in the primaries because he’s nothing but a 78 year old @rickyb .
I channeled Richard Nixon, he said "Poppycock."Nancy is conservative. Most of the House Democratic caucus is moderate. Fear of the far left is nonsensical electoral politics with no basis in reality.
You know she is incorrect at best, a case could be made for a liar pertaining to that statement standing on it's own.Hope you’re right because I’m voting for Biden unless he makes a terrible VP pick.
You know she is incorrect at best, a case could be made for a liar pertaining to that statement standing on it's own.
It's your vote, do as you wish.
What they need though are batteries that will charge quickly. Purely electric non-hybrid cars that need to charge for hours will only work for local commuting. There's a market for that but many people will still want cars they can drive all day to a destination. That's the advantage of hydrogen over current technology if they build enough hydrogen stations. Or at least put hydrogen pumps at current stations. And then there's the amount of lithium available to make batteries. Huge deposit in Bolivia, but how long will it last? May at some point have to come up with a totally different type of battery, or move to another power source.Hydrogen was the future of automobiles before lithium ion batteries. Now there are a few manufacturers making a hydrogen car and every manufacturer making multiple electrics. With modern batteries creeping into the 300-400 mile range, it's becoming such a smaller issue to own only electric cars.
And I really don't think Exxon or Shell are just going to sit quietly and watch their entire business model go down the drains. BP has lost so much market share and have such a low approval since the Gulf disaster they really have no where else to go but away from oil.
You can and do think rationally at times, yet will still, when said and done vote irrationally to the expense of your grandchildren and the nation as a whole.Makes sense to me. The Democrats also won’t be showing any clips of the Party’s Presidential candidates all raising their hands in support of free healthcare for illegal immigrants last year.
The vocal hard left might not be in the driver’s seat of the Party yet. But they are being churned out of colleges and universities at a pretty rapid clip. And it’s clear that the Democratic Party’s Presidential candidates see them as the future of the Party and are eager to remain in their good graces regardless of their own supposed degree of moderation.
While the hard left doesn‘t yet have total control, you must still be an ideological ally to pass the Democratic purity test. Agreeing with the Party 75% of the time isn’t good enough. You might as well just vote for Trump at that level of divergent thought. Right, @It will be fine ?
I'm not a Mod.Old Man Jingles would you please timemark this video for me at those times. I don't know how to do it and at the moment don't particularly care to learn. If you will it will be much appreciated
Most repubs would be just as comfortable sitting on the dim side of the aisle.The Republicans couldn't get anything passed when they had control of it all and I don't see it happening with Democrats in control. Too many people willing to saying 'no' to those high price tags. They would need an overwhelming majority of Democrats to pass the most ambitious plans.
I understand. I only asked you to take the video I offered, time mark it and fix my post. Quote my entire post if you will, with the video time marked.I'm not a Mod.
Understood.Can’t do Trump. Simply won’t vote for President on my ballot if the Democrats prove to have completely lost theirover the next few months. Supporting more rioting, more autonomous zones, more America sucks/systemic racism screams, etc.