Biden: "Americans need friend-15's and maybe some nuclear weapons."

[Brownsocks]

 

[Poop Head]

Wow. Dude is loosing it

 

[rod]

We are DOOMED

 

[sailfish]

I guess the Middle East and the Vietcong never got the memo.

 

[bbsam]

I think it was pretty straightforward. Pretty much this:

In other words, you don’t stand a chance militarily against US forces and the 2nd Amendment doesn’t give you the right to purchase the weapons that would give you a chance.

 

[sailfish]

I think it was pretty straightforward. Pretty much this:
View attachment 342003
In other words, you don’t stand a chance militarily against US forces and the 2nd Amendment doesn’t give you the right to purchase the weapons that would give you a chance.

Lol.

 

[bbsam]

Lol.

I know, I know. David Koresh and Randy Weaver and all their friends were so close to fending off the government invaders!

 

[sailfish]

I know, I know. David Koresh and Randy Weaver and all their friends were so close to fending off the government invaders!

Yep. Completely worthless. No need to further restrict them.

 

[bbsam]

Yep. Completely worthless. No need to further restrict them.

Certainly not for “blood of patriots” reasons.

 

[sailfish]

If the U.S. Gubmint is so unstoppably badass, why are they still getting their sh* pushed in by stone chucking camel friend*ers after all these years?

 

[bbsam]

If the U.S. Gubmint is so unstoppably badass, why are they still getting their sh* pushed in by stone chucking camel friend*ers after all these years?

Maybe because the militias in the US didn’t rally to the aid of the Koresh’s and the Weaver’s. Where in this divided country would that unity come from?

 

[trickpony1]

If the U.S. Gubmint is so unstoppably badass, why are they still getting their sh* pushed in by stone chucking camel friend*ers after all these years?

"Rules of Engagement" are/were different when dealing with the camel friend*ers.
What was the last war we won and why?

Hope this helps.

 

[sailfish]

Maybe because the militias in the US didn’t rally to the aid of the Koresh’s and the Weaver’s. Where in this divided country would that unity come from?

I guess there's nothing to worry about then. Time for them to drop this restrictive nonsense.

 

[sailfish]

"Rules of Engagement" are/were different when dealing with the camel friend*ers.
What was the last war we won and why?

Hope this helps.

What?

 

[El Correcto]

I think it was pretty straightforward. Pretty much this:
View attachment 342003
In other words, you don’t stand a chance militarily against US forces and the 2nd Amendment doesn’t give you the right to purchase the weapons that would give you a chance.

A pistol can start a world war, don’t under estimate the power of an armed population.

 

[bbsam]

A pistol can start a world war, don’t under estimate the power of an armed population.
View attachment 342007

Times have changed. Bringing down skyscrapers begins wars that people end up regretting.

 

[Box Ox]

I think it was pretty straightforward. Pretty much this:
View attachment 342003
In other words, you don’t stand a chance militarily against US forces and the 2nd Amendment doesn’t give you the right to purchase the weapons that would give you a chance.

I think of 2nd Amendment-validated gun ownership as a deterrent to whatever the federal government might otherwise feel it could get away with if the population were unarmed. The price would be too high.

I don't think of it as something that's intended to help the citizenry win decisive battles against the US Army if things really go south.

 

[bbsam]

I think of 2nd Amendment-validated gun ownership as a deterrent to whatever the federal government might otherwise feel it could get away with if the population were unarmed. The price would be too high.

I don't think of it as something that's intended to help the citizenry win decisive battles against the US Army if things really go south.

It’s not me you have to convince.
Then again, I doubt that the real reason the government doesn’t use military force. They simply don’t have to. They can get away with everything they want to in more “acceptable” ways.

Push come to shove though and states decide to secede…well I guess we’ve seen how that goes.

 

[It will be fine]

I think of 2nd Amendment-validated gun ownership as a deterrent to whatever the federal government might otherwise feel it could get away with if the population were unarmed. The price would be too high.

I don't think of it as something that's intended to help the citizenry win decisive battles against the US Army if things really go south.

I think the 2nd amendment didn’t expect the federal government to maintain a standing army. They expected a well regulated militia to provide for defense.

 

[El Correcto]

Times have changed. Bringing down skyscrapers begins wars that people end up regretting.

Under the right circumstances a political assassination can set off a tinder box just the same way it’s done through out history. You people really are naive.