floridays
Well-Known Member
Childish
Bill Barr
- Thread starter MrFedEx
- Start date
TearsInRain
IE boogeyman
democrats lost, Trump won again
get over the butthurt and look to losing again in 2020
get over the butthurt and look to losing again in 2020
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Case in point.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Wrong
It's on the very first page of Vollume II. The OLC has concerns about sealed indictments being leaked.
Last edited:
1989
Well-Known Member
You said obstruction earlier then you talk about Russians. I was commenting on your Russian comments. You can’t even manufacture crimes.
Besides, how does one deflect when you say nothing.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
I said you cannot bring your self to admit his campaign met with and encouraged Russians to meddle in our election.
You deflected and talked about how it's not a crime. You still can't admit it.
Sad.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Understood, it does not prohibit them however. I have read it and understand exactly what Mueller did and how he actually skirted what he is proposing to uphold. Read it for yourself. You are relying on what you have heard.
You clowns use his report to accuse a man that cannot defend himself. This report does accuse, by innuendo and slight of hand and by the express wording,
"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
Exoneration has never been the job of a prosecutor, his job is to prosecute. Defense counsels sole role is to advocate for the accused, it is their job to seek exoneration.
In not exonerating, the prosecutor failed to do a job that is contradictory to his mission.
The report should have been a few sentences to comply with what Mueller says he was trying to if he was truthful.
"We do not have evidence of crime (s) to secure a successful prosecution at trial."
Read it, and the footnotes if you truly want to understand it. Don't rely on talking points.
Last edited:
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
CONCLUSION
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. The evidence we obtained about the President's actions and intent presents difficult issues that would need to be resolved if we were making a traditional prosecutorial judgment. At the same time, if we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Thank you for proving my point.
Fred's Myth
Nonhyphenated American
Wasn't that their purpose to start with?
1989
Well-Known Member
Meaningless as all your non claims
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
You still refuse to admit the Trump campaign met with and encouraged Russians to meddle in our election.
Must be your Trump derangement syndrome.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Following OLC guidelines. Ttku.....
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Your point is Drumpf committed obstruction of Justice that he could not be charged with while in office. Got it.
floridays
Well-Known Member
No, my point is
"Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime,
his only job, period.
1989
Well-Known Member
Irrelevant. You are lacking of a case. Good luck with your ramblings.
MAKAVELI
Well-Known Member
Wrong.
floridays
Well-Known Member
No, you miss it smart guy.
Please site these OLC guidelines you speak of.
Mueller's band of jackals took their own route to pursue their mission,
after they found no criminal culpability.
You mean to tell me he didn't want to be the cat dropping a rat on the doorstep. You aren't talking to your type. We aren't fools.
floridays
Well-Known Member
Educate me then Sir.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
A case for what?
You still can't admit Trump's campaign encouraged Russians to meddle in the election! Lol!
Good luck with your Trump derangement syndrome.
Similar threads
