China Literally $#!+$ On the Rest of the World

rickyb

Well-Known Member
So? Again, you brought up that France has much less emissions than the U.S. But you didn't mention that was because of nuclear energy, which you're against. You're trying to have it both ways. There's really no way that solar and wind are going to meet all of our energy needs. We're either going to have to use fossil fuels or nuclear to make up the difference. If they can make hydrogen or some other fuel a viable option, great. As the world develops there will be an ever greater demand for energy. So everything needs to be on the table until an option that works well enough by itself is produced.
actually i brought up a list of countries with much lower emissions than US and not necessarily bc of nuclear which is a bad idea anyways. renewable energy for many years now can cover world's energy needs, not sure if that includes nuclear or not.

the other problem is our system is too inefficient so theres not enough asset utilization.

everything should not be on the table the environment cant handle it despite what joe biden or obama says.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
actually i brought up a list of countries with much lower emissions than US and not necessarily bc of nuclear which is a bad idea anyways. renewable energy for many years now can cover world's energy needs, not sure if that includes nuclear or not.

the other problem is our system is too inefficient so theres not enough asset utilization.

everything should not be on the table the environment cant handle it despite what joe biden or obama says.
You pointed out France as a place superior to the U.S. in emissions control. I then pointed out that was due to France using nuclear power for most of their electricity production. You then went off about nuclear being bad. You want it both ways, to be able to criticize the U.S. by saying that other countries do it better, then criticize other countries on how they do it better. Make your mind up. As far as efficiency goes, the market determines that. Companies trying to make a profit try to run as efficiently as possible. Governments don't. People often don't. So it appears you'll have to depend on corporations to save the planet. Oh the irony....
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Congress is upset that China is buying up US farms.
They should have noticed years ago when they bought the major pig farms.
Which is funny because just after some of the new owners visited the place, a disease wiped most of the flock.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
You pointed out France as a place superior to the U.S. in emissions control. I then pointed out that was due to France using nuclear power for most of their electricity production. You then went off about nuclear being bad. You want it both ways, to be able to criticize the U.S. by saying that other countries do it better, then criticize other countries on how they do it better. Make your mind up. As far as efficiency goes, the market determines that. Companies trying to make a profit try to run as efficiently as possible. Governments don't. People often don't. So it appears you'll have to depend on corporations to save the planet. Oh the irony....
market doesnt determine efficiency because of govt influence.

markets obviously not efficient anyways.
 

PT Car Washer

Well-Known Member
Congress is upset that China is buying up US farms.
They should have noticed years ago when they bought the major pig farms.
Which is funny because just after some of the new owners visited the place, a disease wiped most of the flock.

A flock of pigs? You're a city boy aren't you.
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
Congress is upset that China is buying up US farms.
They should have noticed years ago when they bought the major pig farms.
Which is funny because just after some of the new owners visited the place, a disease wiped most of the flock.
The Chinese bought the hog farms when TFG was in charge. Those farms became COVID hotspots. Thanks, Donnie.
 
Top