apparently not clear enough for u cuz u dont understand
climate catastrophe
- Thread starter rickyb
- Start date
You wish I didn’t. You shouldn’t have put it all out on the table if you now want to try and make a different argument.
making the same argument
That we should spend money on climate change even if it doesn’t work? Good to hear you’re sticking to it.
thats not what i said.
Old Man Jingles
Rat out of a cage
Hello Losers!
we are paying for the inefficient capitalists
www.insurancejournal.com
Rates to Rise for Millions of Homeowners Under National Flood Insurance Program
The federal government Friday rolled out a flood-insurance program revamped to reflect worsening climate change, a program that will raise rates for
www.insurancejournal.com
Operational needs
Virescit Vulnere Virtus
no u got it wrong: with fossil fuels we go extinct, but we dont need fossil fuels to exist.
do you know what big oil execs plans are for our future?
they have none.
either we figure out a system which is actually efficient or we go extinct.
Operational needs
Virescit Vulnere Virtus
I could be understanding the cartoon wrong, but I believe everything on the left side is only possible BECAUSE of the use of fossil fuels.
youre not worthy of that george carlin quote either. you let corporate machines think for you. u dont come off as a free thinker to me.
they had shoes and clothes before fossil fuels lol. u got tricked into dependency thinking. ur grandchildren have increasingly less than no future.
That cartoon illustrates how dependent we are on fossil fuels. Unless we can come up with viable alternatives our future without oil, coal, natural gas is pretty bleak.
our future is even worse with them.
this system is not very efficient thats the problem. it externalizes the costs. otherwise costs would be much higher to use things. its immature economics
oldngray
nowhere special
A mid-priced internal combustion car that gets 33 miles per gallon would cost $8.58 in overall costs to drive 100 miles at $2.81 a gallon, the study found. But a mid-priced EV, such as Chevrolet Bolt, Nissan Leaf or a Tesla Model 3, would cost $12.95 to drive 100 miles in terms of costs that include recharging the vehicle using mostly a commercial charger.
finance.yahoo.com
Which is more expensive: Charging an electric vehicle or fueling a car with gas?
EVs cost more to power than gasoline costs to fuel an internal combustion car with reasonable gas mileage, according to an Anderson Economic Group report.
DriveInDriveOut
Inordinately Right
Objectively wrong.
Fossil fuels have improved society enormously.
It's not even debatable.
yea i think electric vehicles may be another huge scam because ur using all this energy to move this metal to quite often move just once personA mid-priced internal combustion car that gets 33 miles per gallon would cost $8.58 in overall costs to drive 100 miles at $2.81 a gallon, the study found. But a mid-priced EV, such as Chevrolet Bolt, Nissan Leaf or a Tesla Model 3, would cost $12.95 to drive 100 miles in terms of costs that include recharging the vehicle using mostly a commercial charger.
Which is more expensive: Charging an electric vehicle or fueling a car with gas?
EVs cost more to power than gasoline costs to fuel an internal combustion car with reasonable gas mileage, according to an Anderson Economic Group report.
what % of an electric car is actually being used? 1 seat? 1.5 seats?
public transportation likely the answer.
no theyve left us with a huge environmental bubble which will blow up in my lifetime. they shouldve been obsolete in the 1970s.
Similar threads
