'Go Fund Me' Takes Down Fund Raising For Kyle Rittenhouse

[MAKAVELI]

Did you read the whole thing? All the above only applies to a minor who is in violation of certain statutes. If his lawyer says he was completely legal that's good enough. Will still have to prove it in court but if he's in compliance with those statutes then none of the above applies.

Of course a a lawyer is going to say that. Are you that ignorant?

 

[vantexan]

Of course a a lawyer is going to say that. Are you that ignorant?

The lawyer is an officer of the court and can't openly lie about statutes. Lawyers lie when interpreting witness statements, video, etc but they can't lie about the codified law. Would get them disbarred. Maybe you should watch less tv?

 

[sailfish]

Gun laws in Wisconsin - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Wisconsin state law 948.60(2)(a) states: "Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor." However, the exception is: "when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult." [8] Wisconsin statute 948.60(3)(c) states: "This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593."[9]

"This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593."[9]

s. 941.28 pertains to: Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.
His gun was not an SBR.

ss. 29.593 pertains to: Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.
He was not hunting so this is inapplicable.

ss. 29.304 pertains to: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.
Kyle is 17.

Try again, bro.

 

[oldngray]

A minor can open carry if he's at least 16 and it's a long rifle that's in compliance with a certain statute. Have to see the statute but I'm betting it restricts use of fully automatic weapons. As of right now I like his chances in court much better than what you're saying.

(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593

Good call. Looks like s. 941.28 refers SBR's

Wisconsin Legislature: 941.28

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

ss 29.304 is about under 16 and ss 29.593 is about bow hunting. so they don't apply

 

[vantexan]

Well @MAKAVELI guess you were wrong. Nope, no guessing, you are wrong.

 

[vantexan]

Well that answers my question. I guess you are that ignorant.

Yeah, ask a lawyer if he would get on national tv and lie about what the statutes say. Doesn't apply anyways, lawyer was telling the truth. And like the bad little liberal you are, you were lying to push a false narrative.

 

[MAKAVELI]

"This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593."[9]

s. 941.28 pertains to: Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.
His gun was not an SBR.

ss. 29.593 pertains to: Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.
He was not hunting so this is inapplicable.

ss. 29.304 pertains to: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.
Kyle is 17.

Try again, bro.

Section 1 and 2a make no distinction between what type of firearms constitutes a dangerous weapon.
948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor

Try again bruh.

 

[MAKAVELI]

Section 1 and 2a make no distinction between what type of firearms constitutes a dangerous weapon.
948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor

Try again bruh.

This statute doesn't apply to a sb shot gun or rifle because that would be felony not a misdemeanor.

 

[sailfish]

Section 1 and 2a make no distinction between what type of firearms constitutes a dangerous weapon.
948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor

Try again bruh.

Try what again? That paragraph tells me nothing.

 

[MAKAVELI]

Try what again? That paragraph tells me nothing.

It tells you the class a misdemeanor is for possesion of a dangerous weapon. All firearms in this statute constitute a dangerous weapon.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Did you read the whole thing? All the above only applies to a minor who is in violation of certain statutes. If his lawyer says he was completely legal that's good enough. Will still have to prove it in court but if he's in compliance with those statutes then none of the above applies.

You have a lot more faith in Mak than I do ... he ain't gonna get it!

 

[sailfish]

It tells you the class a misdemeanor is for possesion of a dangerous weapon. All firearms in this statute constitute a dangerous weapon.

You forgot to post the rest.

948.60(2)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

Fine and dandy. BUT,

948.60(3)(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593.


s. 941.28 pertains to: Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.
ss. 29.593 Pertains to: Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.
ss. 29.304 Pertains to: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

No! It's not them!

 

[MAKAVELI]

You forgot to post the rest.

948.60(2)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

Fine and dandy. BUT,

948.60(3)(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593.


s. 941.28 pertains to: Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle.
ss. 29.593 Pertains to: Requirement for certificate of accomplishment to obtain hunting approval.
ss. 29.304 Pertains to: Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.

One the charges against him is possession of a dangerous weapon under the age of 18. So I guess we'll see.

 

[vantexan]

One the charges against him is possession of a dangerous weapon under the age of 18. So I guess we'll see.

And again you left out the last section that says the above doesn't apply if the long rifle is in compliance with the statute and the minor is at least 16. Maybe you should be a lawyer. Nah, you'd get disbarred.

 

[oldngray]

And again you left out the last section that says the above doesn't apply if the long rifle is in compliance with the statute and the minor is at least 16. Maybe you should be a lawyer. Nah, you'd get disbarred.

 

[MAKAVELI]

And again you left out the last section that says the above doesn't apply if the long rifle is in compliance with the statute and the minor is at least 16. Maybe you should be a lawyer. Nah, you'd get disbarred.

They charged him with that when they knew exactly what type of gun he had. Ttku..

 

[vantexan]

They charged him with that when they knew exactly what type of gun he had. Ttku..

Yes, and as the saying goes "a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich." Idiot in St. Louis charged that one couple with all manner of things when they were clearly within their constitutional rights to defend themselves and their property. Will you be going on about how unfair it all is when he's exonerated?

 

[rod]

Yes, a minor can't open carry unless for the exception stated. Que @rod and the jokes.

I don't have a clue what you are talking about.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

And again you left out the last section that says the above doesn't apply if the long rifle is in compliance with the statute and the minor is at least 16. Maybe you should be a lawyer. Nah, you'd get disbarred.

In the least, he would starve to death!