Ineligible to receive retro pay?

[542thruNthru]

You mutherF*

I actually clicked the link just to see where it would take me. I then proceeded to refresh the page two more times because I thought I lost the connection.

You dumb gullible Wisconsin hick! Its Indecisi0n! I bet you used to "hunt" for the snipe also!

Snipe hunt - Wikipedia

 

[scooby0048]

You dumb gullible Wisconsin hick! Its Indecisi0n! I bet you used to "hunt" for the snipe also!

Snipe hunt - Wikipedia

First, I'm a Masshole who happens to live in Wyoming. Second, I know better than to hunt for the snipe. I did however hunt for and find the chupacabra.

 

[542thruNthru]

First, I'm a Masshole who happens to live in Wyoming. Second, I know better than to hunt for the snipe. I did however hunt for and find the chupacabra.

Yeah and she sold your metal detector!

 

[scooby0048]

Yeah and she sold your metal detector!

That just really stings

 

[PeakMode]

Will they?
They never worked in the union under the new contract

There are new FT Sups that work who have been recently promoted that drove or work sorts after Aug 1. From the Aug 1. till the date they were promoted will get their back pay.

 

[Rutherford B Hays]

There are new FT Sups that work who have been recently promoted that drove or work sorts after Aug 1. From the Aug 1. till the date they were promoted will get their back pay.

How are they any different than the ones who quit?

 

[PeakMode]

How are they any different than the ones who quit?

One difference would that they are still employed and getting still a paycheck from UPS. Anyone who put in work hourly should get their back pay.

 

[Rutherford B Hays]

One difference would that they are still employed and getting still a paycheck from UPS. Anyone who put in work hourly should get their back pay.

Contract is for union employees, not management . They have never worked as covered employee under the ratified new contract

 

[PeakMode]

Contract is for union employees, not management . They have never worked as covered employee under the ratified new contract

If the the new contract is retro dated to Aug 1 , 2018 (Which it is). then it possible for a example a driver who drove from Aug. 6 2018 to to March 1, 2019 then became a OnRoadSup March 2, 2019 receive back pay. Wheither you agree with it or not is one thing but they are getting back pay.

 

[Rutherford B Hays]

If the the new contract is retro dated to Aug 1 , 2018 (Which it is). then it possible for a example a driver who drove from Aug. 6 2018 to to March 1, 2019 then became a OnRoadSup March 2, 2019 receive back pay. Wheither you agree with it or not is one thing but they are getting back pay.

What are you basing your confidence on?

 

[upschuck]

If the the new contract is retro dated to Aug 1 , 2018 (Which it is). then it possible for a example a driver who drove from Aug. 6 2018 to to March 1, 2019 then became a OnRoadSup March 2, 2019 receive back pay. Wheither you agree with it or not is one thing but they are getting back pay.

The contract went into effect Apr 29th. The only reason people will get retro is because the contract specifically state raises began Aug 1. In that example, the employee did not work under the contract which started Apr 29.

It's up to the company, if you'll get retro, you have no contractual rights to that money, and with the cost cutting being done now, it's anybody's guess.

 

[just chillin']

The contract went into effect Apr 29th

with that reasoning the contract should expire 5 years from that date. but it dont

 

[upschuck]

with that reasoning the contract should expire 5 years from that date. but it dont

Why wasn't everybody getting paid contractual rates, then?


Because the contract was not in effect yet. I'd be filing grievances for penalty pay and everything, since I wasn't paid correctly.

I thought this was elementary stuff, but evidently it is not.

 

[upschuck]

with that reasoning the contract should expire 5 years from that date. but it dont

Only reason we are getting retro pay, is because the contract states those rates are effective Aug 1, 2018. If it didn't have that date specified, we'd be getting no retro pay.

 

[silenze]

They are under no obligation to give someone a retro check who was not employed as of april 29. Or if that employee is no longer part of the collective bargaining unit.

 

[BigUnionGuy]

They are under no obligation to give someone a retro check who was not employed as of april 29. Or if that employee is no longer part of the collective bargaining unit.

Exactly.

They have no recourse.... because they can't file a grievance.

 

[Benben]

Exactly.

They have no recourse.... because they can't file a grievance.

LOL.

Let me guess, you got your degree in Contractual Law from tRump University?

 

[clean hairy]

You mutherF*

I actually clicked the link just to see where it would take me. I then proceeded to refresh the page two more times because I thought I lost the connection.

What was it PT Barnum said?

 

[clean hairy]

LOL.

Let me guess, you got your degree in Contractual Law from tRump University?

Lawdegree.net
Check it out @scooby

 

[scooby0048]

Lawdegree.net
Check it out @scooby

I think that person you quoted was talking to BUG. Too bad though, I had to get my degree the old fashioned way....

pay a boatload of money, sit in miserable classes, and not be able to cheat with the internet. Now, I don't even work in the field I was educated in. Makes sense.