Sure --the point is Obama spends nothing on war --only social programs --like a good Liberal.
My favorite teabagger slogan..Brilliant!!!!!![]()
we don't oppose the state's wars because they'll be counterproductive or overextend the state's forces. We oppose them because mass murder based on lies can never be morally acceptable. So we don't beg for scraps from the imperial table, and we don't seek a seat at that table. We want to knock the table over.
Lew Rockwell
What would Hitler say ?
Some would certainly argue --He did not give many countries or people a choice !
That was some serious cherry picking and gerrymandering to piece that together from the article.From your wiki link:
""In public statements, especially at the beginning of his rule, Hitler frequently spoke positively about a Nazi vision of "Christian" German culture,[101] and his belief in an Aryan Christ.[105] In 1922, a decade before his ascension to power, Hitler stated before a crowd in Munich:""
As I wrote.
The book that had the biggest influence on Hitlers position on jews was obtained from the writings of Martin Luther, considered the father of the protestant church.
Link to Martin Luthers writings.. judge for yourself if this man could influence a man like Hitler.
http://www.islamdaily.org/en/world-issues/asia-pacific/152.the-jews-and-thier-lies-martin-luther.htm
The book "the jews and their lies" by Martin Luther describes the jews in the most terrible way. Martin Luther, a former Catholic Priest, Bishop and close confidant of the pope became disengaged from the catholic church because he hated the direction the catholic church was going. A bounty was placed on his head by the vatican.
Hitler, like todays republicans, wanted to FORCE religion on its peoples and in its schools. Hitler didnt believe in freedom of religion.
While distorted, Hitler uttered the same religious nonsense that todays republicans use.
Obama and the democratic party have nothing in common with Hitler and his style of government, and rather, the GOP or the party of "old white men" wants a similiar type of country, where white people rule the nation.
TOS.
That was some serious cherry picking and gerrymandering to piece that together from the article.
In the typical piece of literary article, the writer:
Tells the reader what he's going to tell you
Tells you
Summarizes for the reader what he said
Speed readers use this approach to read most things:
First paragraph
First sentence of each of the paragraphs
Last paragraph
In the article, the first 5 sentences pretty summarizes what the author and most historians believe:
Adolf Hitler was raised by an anticlerical, skeptic father and a devout Catholic mother. Baptized and confirmed as a child in Austria, he ceased to participate in the sacraments after childhood.
In adulthood, he became disdainful of Christianity, but in power was prepared to delay clashes with the churches out of political considerations.[1][2][3][4][5]
It is generally believed by historians that Hitler's long term aim was the eradication of Christianity in Germany.[6][7]
He did not believe in the Judeo-Christian notion of God, though various scholars consider his final religious position may have been a form of deism.
Others consider him "atheist".
He also lead the NAZI party which was Socialist in it's beliefs.
Hitler took over this Socialist form of government to become a dictator.
Much like Obama would do if he could.
Just because you say you are one, doesn't mean you are one.The misbelief that hitler was an atheist comes from todays christians who want to distance themselves from Hitler. Unfortunately, its not true.
![]()
Hitler wrote extensively about his "christianity" and his rationale for hating the jews. If you really knew anything about Hitler , you would know this. For centuries, catholics and the christians blamed the jews for killing Jesus, and in some parts, this still applies in religious circles.
Just because his government was communist government, it does not come close to liberal beliefs. All you see is the word socialist, and then associate it to what you consider a socialist in todays world.
I guarantee NONE of you understand Hitler or his mindset. Wiki, while a great quick reference site, hardly is the gospel for real explanations.
Read the link I posted with Martin Luthers writings, then ask yourself, if Adolph Hitler studied these writings as a child and as an adult, even though being born to catholic parents (which isnt disputed) can you see how they would influence such a man to do horrible things?
![]()
Martin Luther was a catholic, but became angry with the church because he did not like the direction of the church when it came to money and power. The early catholics hated the jews as well. It was Martin Luther who converted the bible from latin to english and german.
Martin Luther was a german.
When Martin Luther established the Protestant church, he brought along his antisemitic views with him.
Later, in the USA, it was the KKK that took control of the protestant church and continued with Hitlers ideas about the jews, catholics and blacks..
There is a good book to read on the subject:
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11862282-gospel-according-to-the-klan
The Gospel according to the klan.
TOS.
If you do not like the facts --you make up your own--we have seen it many times before.
Just because you say you are one, doesn't mean you are one.
He also lead the NAZI party which was Socialist in it's beliefs.
Hitler took over this Socialist form of government to become a dictator.
Much like Obama would do if he could.
Actually, he made a false comparison, not a link at all. Is history taught so poorly in America these days that facts are drowned out by political narrative?Long live Socialism !!!
How dare Photog link the Great System of Socialism to Hitler.
Actually, he made a false comparison, not a link at all. Is history taught so poorly in America these days that facts are drowned out by political narrative?