Looks like Gen. Flynn was framed.

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You were asked a straight forward question! Too prove what you say isn't straight out lies! Guess that was too much to ask for!
It is from you. You start or end every conversation with those you disagree with politically as liars or worse. Not playing your game. Gave you something to look up, man up if you dare.
 

bbsam

Moderator
Staff member
It is from you. You start or end every conversation with those you disagree with politically as liars or worse. Not playing your game. Gave you something to look up, man up if you dare.
“...man up if you dare...”.
Dude. WTF is that? You some kinda internet tough guy?
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
It is from you. You start or end every conversation with those you disagree with politically as liars or worse. Not playing your game. Gave you something to look up, man up if you dare.
He is a real dumb piece of s:censored2:t ... I took him off IGNORE a couple days ago and just put him back on IGNORE.
He is definitely not worth my time to bother with his stupid and childish postings.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
Trump should let this play out in the courts.
Get re-elected and then charge everyone involved with treason.
Even the major news outlets could hide from the general public multiple raids by the US Marshall Service when they arrest all the major parties involved including some of those award winning journalists who helped sell this farce.
It was an attempt to removed a duly elected president from office.
Too bad donald couldn't be bothered to testify on his own behalf, under oath, of course.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in December 2017. He will still have to convince Judge Sullivan that he has asserted a viable claim of innocence and that his plea is tainted. Neither of these points is obvious at all. One thing Flynn does not appear to be claiming, after all, is that his answers to questions at that FBI interview were inaccurate.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators in December 2017. He will still have to convince Judge Sullivan that he has asserted a viable claim of innocence and that his plea is tainted. Neither of these points is obvious at all. One thing Flynn does not appear to be claiming, after all, is that his answers to questions at that FBI interview were inaccurate.
Just came out that Strzok altered the Flynn interview 302's. Maybe when Judge Sullivan throws all of this out you'll believe Flynn got railroaded. He was the only one who was convicted who was not accused of an underlying crime, just lying to the FBI. And the agents who did the initial interview stated they didn't believe he lied to them. But Strzok made it seem that he did. You know Strzok, right? The high up FBI manager caught in text messages telling Lisa Page they would make sure Trump wasn't elected. Who was fired for his political bias?
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
Just came out that Strzok altered the Flynn interview 302's. Maybe when Judge Sullivan throws all of this out you'll believe Flynn got railroaded. He was the only one who was convicted who was not accused of an underlying crime, just lying to the FBI. And the agents who did the initial interview stated they didn't believe he lied to them. But Strzok made it seem that he did. You know Strzok, right? The high up FBI manager caught in text messages telling Lisa Page they would make sure Trump wasn't elected. Who was fired for his political bias?
While FBI officials appear to have discussed the strategic purpose of the interview, there’s nothing whatsoever wrong with that.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
The Flynn interview gave Flynn every opportunity to tell the truth. As the FBI’s partially redacted memo documenting Flynn’s interview reflects, the questions were careful. They were specific. The agents, as Strzok later recalled in a formal FBI interview of his own, planned to try to jog Flynn’s memory if he said he could not remember a detail by using the exact words they knew he had used in his conversation with Kislyak. And Flynn, as he admitted in open court—twice—did not tell the truth. That is not entrapment or a set-up, and it is very far indeed from outrageous government conduct. It’s conducting an interview—and a witness at the highest levels of government lying in it.

Lawfare
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
As the judge wrote back in December: “[T]he Court agrees with the government that there were no material changes in the interview reports, and that those reports track the interviewing FBI agents’ notes.” Sullivan went on: “Having carefully reviewed the interviewing FBI agents’ notes, the draft interview reports, the final version of the FD302, and the statements contained therein, the Court agrees with the government that those documents are ‘consistent and clear that [Mr. Flynn] made multiple false statements to the [FBI] agents about his communications with the Russian Ambassador on January 24, 2017.’”
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
As the judge wrote back in December: “[T]he Court agrees with the government that there were no material changes in the interview reports, and that those reports track the interviewing FBI agents’ notes.” Sullivan went on: “Having carefully reviewed the interviewing FBI agents’ notes, the draft interview reports, the final version of the FD302, and the statements contained therein, the Court agrees with the government that those documents are ‘consistent and clear that [Mr. Flynn] made multiple false statements to the [FBI] agents about his communications with the Russian Ambassador on January 24, 2017.’”
Leftist anti Trump fake news.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
As the judge wrote back in December: “[T]he Court agrees with the government that there were no material changes in the interview reports, and that those reports track the interviewing FBI agents’ notes.” Sullivan went on: “Having carefully reviewed the interviewing FBI agents’ notes, the draft interview reports, the final version of the FD302, and the statements contained therein, the Court agrees with the government that those documents are ‘consistent and clear that [Mr. Flynn] made multiple false statements to the [FBI] agents about his communications with the Russian Ambassador on January 24, 2017.’”
Tell me why then did the FBI threaten to go after Flynn's son if they had everything they needed? Flynn admitted to lying in court after he was ruined financially and they threatened his family. If everything was by the book then Strzok has nothing to worry about going forward. We'll see.
 
Last edited:

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
It’s not just that Flynn didn’t disclose his foreign contacts, but also whatever money he received from them.

At a minimum, this is unreported income. At worst, it’s bribery for Flynn’s willingness to conduct some kind of illegal activity.
 

Old Man Jingles

Rat out of a cage
AP Exclusive: Justice Dept dropping Flynn’s criminal case

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department on Thursday said it is dropping the criminal case against President Donald Trump’s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, abandoning a prosecution that became a rallying cry for the president and his supporters in attacking the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation.

The move is a stunning reversal for one of the signature cases brought by special counsel Robert Mueller. It comes even though prosecutors for the past three years have maintained that Flynn lied to the FBI in a January 2017 interview about his conversations with the Russian ambassador.
 
Top