Mugarolla
Light 'em up!
Being scheduled no hours but still being employed is illegal, no?
No it is not.
Is it possible for him to do something against the rules?
Yes.
If yes, then your point is utterly irrelevant. It's pure assumption.
No assumption. I take that back. I'm assuming the Steward would do his job.
If the labor manager did something against the rules, the Steward would have said something.
No mention anywhere of you saying the Steward told the labor manager that he cannot do that.
So it is a pretty well-informed assumption.
You can't say he wasn't breaking the rules because he isn't allowed to therefore you assume he meant something else. That's horrible logic.
No, I'm saying that if the labor manager was breaking the rules, the Steward would have said something. And nothing was said, hence, the labor manager probably was not breaking the rules.
it's just not applicable to THIS situation because of the 3rd option presented
Was this third option actually present? If it was, the Steward would have said something.
So I do not believe that this third option was actually present.
I believe this third option was part of the second option. Meaning that when you're fired, you will have zero hours.
But the 3rd option is what makes this different and pretending it doesnt exist is wild to me.
Again, I don't believe this third option was present.
If the labor manager said resign or I'm taking away all your hours, and that's all he said, and left it there, the Steward would have said he cannot do that.
So I believe this option was not present.
And now you're saying this wasn't you, that you heard this second hand, and that you're getting the continuing story as time progresses, that you did not hear it all at once.
And we all know how that goes. The first person says green. By the time the third person repeats it, it's yellow.