The master was not passed by the way it was imposed and it is ratified due to less then 50% turn out. PASSED ha that is funny better watch out some of these guys might not like that terminology being used to describe the last contract vote.
Sorry Brother it was passed. No need to argue semantics. But since we are ALL the Union, if you don't like the language in the constitution, now is the time to start drafting new language. 2021 is two short years away
I definitely don't like the word passed. EVERY person at my center who talks about back pay/raises says something like "The contract passed, what's taking so long for our raise?" I have a hard time not responding like a dick.
Not arguing just correcting you, the master is not in effect until all supplements are passed by the way.
The OP's post wasn't about working under an old contract. We are. It was about it being passed
I think @IVE GOTTA PACKAGE 4U was trying to say in a earlier post was the contract shouldn't take this long to be in effect, I could be wrong but as of right now we do not get the new economic improvements until the last of the supplements are finished.
The Master is not getting renegotiated because it passed. The outstanding supplements did not pass. The NorCal agreement did pass
Last time I saw the voter numbers a majority that did vote, voted NO and due to the constitutional langauge in the IBT allowed them to IMPOSE the contract NOT PASS.
Also many other supplements such as central states where IMPOSED NOT PASSED. Not that hard to see or really just admit that the union had it not used the constitutional langauge would have had to go back and renegotiate the contracts because they did NOT PASS.
The IBT
ram 'em through
Well if the selfish people....would vote, the IBT would be able to, oh, never mind. Lol.
How about the pilots and mechanics..... going 5 years without one...
I know.
Perhaps....
