And nobody came to save Randy Weaver’s family. It was him against the federal government. He lost.Nobody is coming to save you but yourself.
And nobody came to save Randy Weaver’s family. It was him against the federal government. He lost.Nobody is coming to save you but yourself.
When did I say people should give up their guns? I have no intention of giving up mine.
I’m not at all against gun control. It should just be smart and the people passing such legislation and the people electing those people should understand what they’re talking about.
Maybe he could have argued that in court.His family deserved to be murdered because he was baited into cutting the barrel off a shotgun by a glowie?
Point is, "good guy with a gun" is a strawman I see used entirely more by gun opposition to mock than unironically by gun proponents.And nobody came to save Randy Weaver’s family. It was him against the federal government. He lost.
That’s because it’s something that folks like Wayne LaPierre alway liked to spout off about but the actual occurrences are far fewer than the gun industry would like to admit.Point is, "good guy with a gun" is a strawman I see used entirely more by gun opposition to mock than unironically by gun proponents.
You quoted me in somehow suggesting that people should give up their guns. The quote you used said nothing of the sort.Not at all.
Almost as if the media under reports how often it happens.That’s because it’s something that folks like Wayne LaPierre alway liked to spout off about but the actual occurrences are far fewer than the gun industry would like to admit.
Supporting gun control legislation is just that.You quoted me in somehow suggesting that people should give up their guns. The quote you used said nothing of the sort.
That’s possible. But it wouldn’t be that hard for the NRA and gun industry to compile that data with specifics and get it out there. There is plenty of conservative media to get that ball rolling.Almost as if the media under reports how often it happens.
Sorry. I haven’t seen any gun legislation that says that. And I live in Illinois!Supporting gun control legislation is just that.
I will wait for CNN to report how many times guns were successfully used as a deterrent without needing to fire a shot.That’s possible. But it wouldn’t be that hard for the NRA and gun industry to compile that data with specifics and get it out there. There is plenty of conservative media to get that ball rolling.
Why would proposed legislation cause you to panic buy?I have seen proposed gun legislation that has had me “panic buying” guns I might not be able to get for a few years.
Because Illinois has the votes to ban ARs and AKs and seem to be determined to do so. I’d like to have them before waiting for the Supreme Court to rule against them.Why would proposed legislation cause you to panic buy?
Why? If the data exists, why not get that competing narrative out there?I will wait for CNN to report how many times guns were successfully used as a deterrent without needing to fire a shot.
So gun control legislation would cause people to have to give up being able to legally obtain these guns. Carry on.Because Illinois has the votes to ban ARs and AKs and seem to be determined to do so. I’d like to have them before waiting for the Supreme Court to rule against them.
Those things you are allowed to buy are neither AR’s or AK’s.Because Illinois has the votes to ban ARs and AKs and seem to be determined to do so. I’d like to have them before waiting for the Supreme Court to rule against them.
Yes. So explain to me how that means I’m going to have to give them up.So gun control legislation would cause people to have to give up being able to legally obtain these guns. Carry on.