My mom wants to save everything for "the kids", she lives very miserly.
We tell her to spend some of that money one time, so she hired people to cut down a couple trees.You shouldn't leave your kids any debts but they shouldn't expect you to leave them everything either.
We tell her to spend some of that money one time, so she hired people to cut down a couple trees.
I like doing that stuff, but that would not of cost much money. We are also 4 hours away.You're lucky---my mother-in-law still calls me or her eldest boy (66) to do all her stuff. I don't mind helping but sometimes she don't realize we aren't "teenage boys" anymore.
We tell her to spend some of that money one time, so she hired people to cut down a couple trees.
That is my understanding as well...
We will vote on it, but if is voted down, cuts will be made anyway.
Considering only active union members will be permitted to vote, does anybody think that it even has a chance of being voted down. We are eating our own!
Sent using BrownCafe App
I like to do as much myself as possible but you come to a point where your time is more important than the money required.
I received an envelope today, nothing in it though. My wife was wondering if I was planning on retiring soon.I received a letter today from the CS retiree representative. It didn't say much other than being negative with more information to follow in later letters. Also it was only from the point of view of Central States with no mention of UPS.
Pensions are Ponzi schemes that rely on newer younger workers to help pay for YOUR pension.
They should be illegal and replaced with a retirement plan that money is deposited into EACH workers INDIVIDUAL account to be used for that persons retirement only.
But union officers will never go for that.
Those account don't require $100+k a year TRUSTEE SPOTS that the union higher ups like to be on.
Another not ready for prime time player steps up. Pension and H&W Trustees are unpaid positions. Always.
A Ponzi scheme pays one investor "interest" with another investors money, without any investment and the house of cards always fails. A pension pays with invested returns, and properly managed is self sustaining in perpetuity.
I received a letter today from the CS retiree representative. It didn't say much other than being negative with more information to follow in later letters. Also it was only from the point of view of Central States with no mention of UPS.
Another swing and a miss...none of the aboved named are Union Trustees on the CS Pension, so they aren't getting a union salary hence no double dipping as you've inaccurately alleged.This is from a couple of years ago, but still to the point that the trustees will get paid, one way or the other.
The Central States Funds "Dirty Dozen"...
Tom Nyhan $662,060
Mark Angerame $430,660
James Condon $373,047
Albert Madden $371,229
Robert Coco $363,604
John J. Franczyk Jr. $362,074
Albert Nelson $305,811
Peter Priede $278,407
William Schaefer $277,391
Patrick Moroney $223,217
Ray Hale $221,155
Scott Robbins $202,269
Source: Central States Pension Fund and Central States Health & Welfare Fund (yes they double dip) 2013 Form 5500 Reports to the Department of Labor!
As did I.I got that letter last week also.
Page 92I have looked all through Article 69 in the Southern Supplement and have yet to find wording that clearly indicates that UPS will be liable for any shortfalls of the CS plan for UPSers or cuts starting with other non UPS retirees listed in any documents outside of the contract. If anyone could provide a clear wording on this, whether in documents from the earmark for UPS during the lobbying, or in the actual wording of the Master/Supplement, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Feel free to point it out on which page
http://teamster.org/sites/teamster.org/files/52013revised75310SouthernArea3.pdf
Thanks, was tearing apart the supplement when I should have been looking at the master.Page 92