UnionStrong
Sorry, but I don’t care anymore.
ExactlyBut there are 40 million in circulation. The numbers simply don’t support the idea that they cannot or are not be owned responsibly by the vast majority of owners.
ExactlyBut there are 40 million in circulation. The numbers simply don’t support the idea that they cannot or are not be owned responsibly by the vast majority of owners.
Really hasn’t been much for proliferation. Mostly decline.
From 1973 to 2021, the percentage of American households that reported having any guns in the home dropped by 28 percent.
This survey. Maybe it is absurd. But you do drive a package car.What survey? Lol. Do you own an assault weapon? By the actual definition, I don’t. But by the fraudulent government definition, anyone with a semi automatic scary rifle does. It’s absurd.
No, I don’t. I drive a Honda AccordThis survey. Maybe it is absurd. But you do drive a package car.
I still don't believe these weapons are worth their societal cost. Most people are "good guys with guns" until the day they're not.But there are 40 million in circulation. The numbers simply don’t support the idea that they cannot or are not be owned responsibly by the vast majority of owners.
I know this probably isn’t saying much but IMO I have enough knowledge and experience with firearms to participate in this conversation.@Integrity stick to what you know, because you obviously don’t know anything about firearms
I seriously doubt it. Go ask your “spirit” again. Are you conjuring spirits again?I know this probably isn’t saying much but IMO I have enough knowledge and experience with firearms to participate in this conversation.
No doubt in my mind and spirit about that.
That is your opinion.I seriously doubt it.
I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know. No doubt about that. My spirit concurs.That is your opinion.
I respect that.
Peace
![]()
That description could almost any anything. The term semi automatic is meaningless as well.a "Military Weapon", typically:
- light weight
- short barreled
- capable of noise suppression
- easily switched between semi and fully automatic.
IMO this comment is a bit strange to me.I have forgotten more about firearms than you will ever know. No doubt about that.
Actually it has meaning and definition.That description could almost any anything. The term semi automatic is meaningless as well.
I agree. In fact, I’d be in favor of appropriate firearm training from a very young age. I’d like to see the mystery and stigma taken out of the entire industry. Getting past the movie/video game/fairytale/omnipotent lie of what the mechanical object is and how it works would be helpful. Understanding the moral, legal, and societal implications of a decision to use a weapon in self defense in my belief is an absolute must.I still don't believe these weapons are worth their societal cost. Most people are "good guys with guns" until the day they're not.
Again, at the very least I'd like to see these high magazine, high fire-rate AR-15 style firearms require a special federal license. Make them difficult to acquire. Kind of like CDLs at the state level. Allowing just any 18 year old to legally jump in the seat of an 18-wheeler would be seen as insane. It's a similar thing with these rifles.
Brilliant!I agree. In fact, I’d be in favor of appropriate firearm training from a very young age. I’d like to see the mystery and stigma taken out of the entire industry. Getting past the movie/video game/fairytale/omnipotent lie of what the mechanical object is and how it works would be helpful. Understanding the moral, legal, and societal implications of a decision to use a weapon in self defense in my belief is an absolute must.
There’s a lot than can be done beyond the rhetoric. I have my doubts that the parties involved are ready to leav their bunkers.
Doesn't need to be highly concealable to cause more human carnage is a short period of time than most other weapons. 9mm is devastating but a .223 round fired through a human body is much worse. We should draw the line somewhere.
Why is the AR-15 style the weapon of choice for these random mass shootings? Because it's highly effective.
talking point after talking boy,Doesn't need to be highly concealable to cause more human carnage is a short period of time than most other weapons. 9mm is devastating but a .223 round fired through a human body is much worse. We should draw the line somewhere.
Why is the AR-15 style the weapon of choice for these random mass shootings? Because it's highly effective.
I lifetime of experience with firearms of all types. Reading about them, buying and selling them both personally and professionally.IMO this comment is a bit strange to me.
How you possibly know this? In reality I mean.
What on earth are you basing your comparison on?
Peace be with you.
![]()
Gosh, we used to do that. Matter fact, when we were talking about the NRA I’ve never once paid for membership, but I did win a lifetime membership during a sharpshooter contest and a $500 scholarship that was sponsored by my high school because I was in the rifle club that was also sponsored by the high school, and the weapons were kept right on high school property. That wasn’t a lifetime ago it was 1990I agree. In fact, I’d be in favor of appropriate firearm training from a very young age. I’d like to see the mystery and stigma taken out of the entire industry. Getting past the movie/video game/fairytale/omnipotent lie of what the mechanical object is and how it works would be helpful. Understanding the moral, legal, and societal implications of a decision to use a weapon in self defense in my belief is an absolute must.
There’s a lot than can be done beyond the rhetoric. I have my doubts that the parties involved are ready to leav their bunkers.
Try a 400H&H...talking point after talking boy,Please stop you don’t like AR’s because they’re black scary guns. .223 round is very ordinary, and not at all. Devastating. There are far far more devastating rounds. LOL.
When looking at the .22LR vs .223, the truth is that the .223 is, in fact, a .22 caliber round. While the media loves to portray this as a ‘huge assault bullet’ and only meant for use in warfare, the truth is that a .223 round is a relatively small and not particularly powerful.”
![]()
.22LR vs .223 Remington - A Beginner's Guide - The Truth About Guns
.223 vs .22LR While both are .22 rounds, they're different cartidges with with different use cases. Know your ammo.www.thetruthaboutguns.com
Logic will not prevail here. Just sayingtalking point after talking boy,Please stop you don’t like AR’s because they’re black scary guns. .223 round is very ordinary, and not at all. Devastating. There are far far more devastating rounds. LOL.
When looking at the .22LR vs .223, the truth is that the .223 is, in fact, a .22 caliber round. While the media loves to portray this as a ‘huge assault bullet’ and only meant for use in warfare, the truth is that a .223 round is a relatively small and not particularly powerful.”
![]()
.22LR vs .223 Remington - A Beginner's Guide - The Truth About Guns
.223 vs .22LR While both are .22 rounds, they're different cartidges with with different use cases. Know your ammo.www.thetruthaboutguns.com
600 nitroTry a 400H&H...
Pretends he is a gun owner and a second amendment advocate, and then knows nothing about weapons only talking pointsLogic will not prevail here. Just saying