NORTH KOREA GOVERNMENT CONFISCATING ALL PET DOGS TO BE USED TO FEED HUMANS!

rickyb

Well-Known Member
not that much different than our own bizarre practices'

your problem is you think some animals are more important than other. the other problem is you keep quoting propaganda against enemy state. you never quote articles about allied states food practices.
 

Wally

BrownCafe Innovator & King of Puns
not that much different than our own bizarre practices'

your problem is you think some animals are more important than other. the other problem is you keep quoting propaganda against enemy state. you never quote articles about allied states food practices.
Some are more important to us. We don't eat dogs
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Some are more important to us.
BS your food stories are propaganda as a pretext to war. which countries have you covered? china, NK, who else? a war in the case of china which you cant win. america is a failed state, what makes you think it can win a war?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
hey hows US food security going?
They're rounding up pets to eat and you're asking about our food security as if there's a problem? Sometimes you outdo yourself which is always amazing because most of the time you're so far from being right you can't be seen in the distance. And yet you'll keep coming back with ridiculous statements like the above. Communist countries gave up communism because it doesn't work. They tried to make it work for decades. All it did was hurt their population and put them decades behind the West in development. The only reasons North Korea even still exists is the rulers put a gun to everyone's head and the Chinese prop them up. And yet somehow you think that there's some equivalence between their food security and ours.
 

DriveInDriveOut

Inordinately Right
better or worse than 10 years ago?
1597004124405.jpg
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
They're rounding up pets to eat and you're asking about our food security as if there's a problem? Sometimes you outdo yourself which is always amazing because most of the time you're so far from being right you can't be seen in the distance. And yet you'll keep coming back with ridiculous statements like the above. Communist countries gave up communism because it doesn't work. They tried to make it work for decades. All it did was hurt their population and put them decades behind the West in development. The only reasons North Korea even still exists is the rulers put a gun to everyone's head and the Chinese prop them up. And yet somehow you think that there's some equivalence between their food security and ours.
i would guess the system around the world is a rigged one for the rich where the nanny state helps the rich, and rugged individualism and markets for everyone who isnt well off.

now in america food security is currently a big enough problem you could conceivably pass the same ridiculous laws to reduce it.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
i would guess the system around the world is a rigged one for the rich where the nanny state helps the rich, and rugged individualism and markets for everyone who isnt well off.

now in america food security is currently a big enough problem you could conceivably pass the same ridiculous laws to reduce it.
Again, absolutely ludicrous statements. No one goes hungry in the U.S. if they don't want to. There are agencies and charities that see to that. Most people though pay their way by working or by retirement funds. And no one is eating their dogs unless they're psychotic or just moved here from a culture that does eat dog meat.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Again, absolutely ludicrous statements. No one goes hungry in the U.S. if they don't want to. There are agencies and charities that see to that. Most people though pay their way by working or by retirement funds. And no one is eating their dogs unless they're psychotic or just moved here from a culture that does eat dog meat.
so youre saying all of the food insecure people in america are on hunger strike or something? you have a perfect system with no gaps?
 
Top