newfie
Well-Known Member
This is the one I meant to reply to:
Sorry about that but just for good measure, "You suck petrified donkey D*s."![]()
dude I'm putting ice on my ass right now that one hurt

This is the one I meant to reply to:
Sorry about that but just for good measure, "You suck petrified donkey D*s."![]()
Could have stopped at, drumpfettes don’t read.
That’s impressive.
Now...
When Hillary Clinton said, “What difference does it make?!?” What was she truly saying?
When Donald Trump said he fired Mueller over “the Russian thing,” what was he saying?
When the president first said the Russian meeting was about adoption, and then about opposition research, and then collusion isn’t a crime, what was he really saying?
I know, I know. All made up “fake news” and a vast left wing conspiracy.
Not even a decent try ... in fact, I would call it wimpy.
Rand Paul is a Republican politician!
Social Issues that cost money aren't social issues I support and I imagine neither do the Pauls.
So, yes, there is a gray area that I do not support.
My beliefs are based on the freedom of the individual not one individual experiencing the largess of the government by taking money from one person and giving it to another person.
I support taking money from an individual to build infrastructure such as roads and enforce clean air policies.
If you really applied yourself, you might understand some day.
Sooooooo unfair . . . holding Rudy to his own words.
I know, especially with bbsam!the flaw in your argument in explaining it to a true liberal is they will never understand the part where you do not offer a solution with tax payer dollars.
That sentence structure.the flaw in your argument in explaining it to a true liberal is they will never understand the part where you do not offer a solution with tax payer dollars.
That's one thing we can always rely on you to bring to the table.What a clusterof nonsense.
Try to follow the conversation dipThat's one thing we can always rely on you to bring to the table.
Why would that even matter? If you can’t indict a sitting president, it doesn’t matter. If you can indict a sitting president, you don’t need his testimony to do it anyway. That he would lie under oath...nobody would be surprised, nobody would bat an eye.you make a convincing argument for trump staying out of the muller perjury trap
Why would that even matter? If you can’t indict a sitting president, it doesn’t matter. If you can indict a sitting president, you don’t need his testimony to do it anyway. That he would lie under oath...nobody would be surprised, nobody would bat an eye.
Enlighten me.I don't believe you're that ignorant.
I agreed. Jingles, or whatever he’s calling himself, was management at the time of the strike. By definition, that’s not a scab.By definition, a scab is worse .
He is on a dumb butt roll today ... must have had a good time last night and killed too many brain cells.I don't believe you're that ignorant.
Unfortunately, "scab" has been almost as abused as "racist" to the point that neither word carries any meaning or force.I agreed. Jingles, or whatever he’s calling himself, was management at the time of the strike. By definition, that’s not a scab.
Enlighten me.
Is Trump unable to tell the truth?
I give you both the opportunity to enlighten and all you can do is insult. You deserve your president.He is on a dumb butt roll today ... must have had a good time last night and killed too many brain cells.
You're the one posting stupidI give you both the opportunity to enlighten and all you can do is insult. You deserve your president.
I give you both the opportunity to enlighten and all you can do is insult. You deserve your president.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/john-...iuliani-trump-is-going-to-wind-up-behind-barsYou're the one posting stupidtoday ... don't try and put it on someone else.
That is thinking like an addict!