No he didn't, it was a much different situation. But it seems to me you have lost the argument when you resort to comparing Trump to Obama as a means of justification.the process is starting. Obama wanted to ban these same countries. the only difference is trumps got balls to do it, Obama didnt
okNo he didn't, it was a much different situation. But it seems to me you have lost the argument when you resort to comparing Trump to Obama as a means of justification.
I didn't know Pope Francis built it?
Brietbart is literally state run media now. I would strongly question any story you get from there and search out other sources if you want info relating to them.
easiest one to copy and paste on my phone. the story is in Google if you want to look them up. I'll let you make those choices.Brietbart is literally state run media now. I would strongly question any story you get from there and search out other sources if you want info relating to them.
Did Obama's ban apply to legal permanent resident holders of green cards?did you say this when Obama did it for six months in 2011.
You tell meDid Obama's ban apply to legal permanent resident holders of green cards?
Contrary to Trump’s Sunday statement and the repeated claims of his defenders, the Obama administration did not “ban visas for refugees from Iraq for six months.” For one thing, refugees don’t travel on visas. More importantly, while the flow of Iraqi refugees slowed significantly during the Obama administration’s review, refugees continued to be admitted to the United States during that time, and there was not a single month in which no Iraqis arrived here. In other words, while there were delays in processing, there was no outright ban.You tell me
okContrary to Trump’s Sunday statement and the repeated claims of his defenders, the Obama administration did not “ban visas for refugees from Iraq for six months.” For one thing, refugees don’t travel on visas. More importantly, while the flow of Iraqi refugees slowed significantly during the Obama administration’s review, refugees continued to be admitted to the United States during that time, and there was not a single month in which no Iraqis arrived here. In other words, while there were delays in processing, there was no outright ban.
Sorry, Mr. President: The Obama Administration Did Nothing Similar to Your Immigration Ban
Wet foot, dry foot does seem like a policy that should have ended when we decided to normalize relations with Cuba. I'm not entirely sure why Cubans were getting such special treatment anyway, but I'll admit I've never cared enough about it to do much research. Is Cuba that much worse than every other poor Caribbean island?Cubans Newly Blocked at U.S. Border Place Hopes in Trump.
new York times good enough for you, same story
I have no clue, I just posted to show the double standard.Wet foot, dry foot does seem like a policy that should have ended when we decided to normalize relations with Cuba. I'm not entirely sure why Cubans were getting such special treatment anyway, but I'll admit I've never cared enough about it to do much research. Is Cuba that much worse than every other poor Caribbean island?
There's a big difference between Cubans no longer automatically getting political asylum as soon as they step foot in America and Trumps ban. Trump is banning people that have been following the proper procedures. Obama cancelling wet foot dry foot just stopped people getting free passes. If you like Trumps ban you should love ending wet foot, dry foot.I have no clue, I just posted to show the double standard.
I'm actually for changing the whole immigration process. I think like I said before everything should be reviewed when a new administration takes over. which this isn't really a ban, it is a pause for 90 days which should happen regardless the presidentThere's a big difference between Cubans no longer automatically getting political asylum as soon as they step foot in America and Trumps ban. Trump is banning people that have been following the proper procedures. Obama cancelling wet foot dry foot just stopped people getting free passes. If you like Trumps ban you should love ending wet foot, dry foot.
It's only temporary if you take Trump at his word. After their review it could easily become permanent.I'm actually for changing the whole immigration process. I think like I said before everything should be reviewed when a new administration takes over. which this isn't really a ban, it is a pause for 90 days which should happen regardless the president
Brietbart is literally state run media now. I would strongly question any story you get from there and search out other sources if you want info relating to them.