tieguy
Banned
No surprises here. coverage of McCain has been negative , Obama positive.
http://journalism.org/node/13307
http://journalism.org/node/13307
No surprises here. coverage of McCain has been negative , Obama positive.
http://journalism.org/node/13307
"Obama’s numbers are similar to what we saw for John Kerry four years ago as he began rising in the polls, and McCain’s numbers are almost identical to what we saw eight years ago for Democrat Al Gore."
TIE,
consider the press doing McCain a favor by not putting him in the news as much...sort of like keeping grandpa off the phone!
LOL LOL LOL LOL![]()
I wonder if the negative coverage has anything to do with the fact that he is behind, and he is running a negative campaign? For example, when talking about polls, the stories were positive for Obama, after all he is leading in the polls, and dealing with the financial crisis favored Obama as well.
That seems to be the conclusion reached in the article.
If McCain had been leading and steadier in dealing with real issues, instead of launching spurious attacks, he would have had more positive stories, simple as that.
Tie, Really?
Every educator and politicain in the Chicago area has had associations with Ayres. Has Ayres ever been convicted of a crime? Has G. Gordon Liddy? Charles Keating?
You are beginning to flail a bit. Darn that reality.
Dodging the questions asked?I don't believe I was commenting on the corrupt systems of chicago. try to keep up.
Dodging the questions asked?
How typical.
feel free to post. I would contend the press has always had a cozy relationship with the democratic candidate.
Bob the Barr?The
Be glad they talk about McCain at all. The national media doesn't even admit my guy exists.
Seriously, has TOS posted on any other part of this site other than current events? Not saying that he/she has to, but I could swear this was a forum for UPS and the other package delivery companies out there for leisure.
Who told you i wasnt a ups'er?
and what is it to you?
Sorry your little playground has other people on it from time to time, I realize some of you folks like to roll around in the mud together.
I choose to spend my time educating myself on the realities of life, not repeating right wing talk shows garbage and take ownership of it.![]()
yea she was banned here once. She's found a way to mask her IP for the moment.
What's your point? As far as I know Liddy nor Keating have killed anyone in domestic terrorist attacks.Tie, Really?
Every educator and politicain in the Chicago area has had associations with Ayres. Has Ayres ever been convicted of a crime? Has G. Gordon Liddy? Charles Keating?
You are beginning to flail a bit. Darn that reality.
What's your point? As far as I know Liddy nor Keating have killed anyone in domestic terrorist attacks.
Ayers may not have been convicted but has publicly admitted that he was responsible for bombings and after expressing that he was not sorry for that, then went on to say he was only sorry he didn't do enough.
Yeah boy that's the kind of guy I want my President hangin out with. I'm not too sure financially ruining someone equates with blowing them up.