You are making Fred's case for him. You say, "Fred wants control over the outcome.". He is entirely free to have that control. What he cannot do is dictate how that outcome is reached. If I average 800 stops a day and the goal is set at 99%, Fred doesn't get to say whether I do it with a team of 6 drivers working 12 hours or 10 working 8 hours. Of course there are Federal, state, and local laws that must be adhered to by both Fred and contractors, but that goes for all companies. But why would FedEx continue a relationship with contractors who have high turnover, poor service, sub-par safety records, etc.? Do you call that "control"?
You often talk about Fred's money corrupting politicians. Ok. But this is the world we live in. You may as well say that if it weren't for gerrymandering, we'd live in a very different country. Even though both statements could be very true, they aren't going to change. Courts hold up gerrymandering because politicians want them to and politicians uphold the purposely vague wording of the IC statute because businesses (not just Fred) want them to.