Discussion in 'UPS Discussions' started by Kanovic, Sep 9, 2019.
that is very shocking and I am not easily impressed
At least you have an excuse and you can blame others for not filing.
My experience has shown this thought process is pretty typical of malcontents.
Yes, that’s the sad part.
Wasn’t your comment critical of your Safety Committee?
If not then my bad.
become a Police Officer and visit the doughnut shop on a regular basis?
So....you CAN’T explain why such a grievance would ACTUALLY have merit? Only REPEATING the article over and over that you THINK was violated doesn’t make it so.
trolling or clueless
I guess your original complaint has no merit.
You asked for the article # in your post.
And yet you give me a hard time.
I can see that Integrity is not high on your list.
You can just go ahead and continue to make such bold negative statements about your Safety Committee and do nothing about it.
I am sorry my posting content or style displeases you.
I don’t know how negative responses such as this are productive or beneficial to open discussion but I guess you have your reasons.
You haven’t provided an article that’s been violated. Nor any evidence that the article you mentioned (at nausea) was violated. Your grievance would be laughed off at just about every local level and would be returned as “No articles violated.”
No worries about your Safety Committee then!
I will disregard your initial complaint/comment on this discussion thread about your Safety Committee.
I think you know what you are doing. I kinda like it. Lol.
Just trying to have some discussion on the topics and issues presented in the various forums on the BC.
Individuals who try to be bullies on internet discussion threads are not posting with Integrity, but against him or it I mean.
IMHO These are the individuals who seem to have the most problems with integrity, oh I mean Integrity.
There Was no worries about my center’s safety committee in the first place. Nor was there an accusation of a contract violation. Those points were both manufactured by you and have been refuted handedly.
Ok. If that’s the way you see it.
I hope your Safety Committee continues to operate as per the CBA and continues to achieve the results expected from a committee that follows the contract.
I must have misread all your statements.
Please forgive me, I will try to be more careful in the future.
So I have to infer that you believe following the contract is a bad idea.
I find it intriguing that you and a brand new member (quad decade guy) push the same agenda (the contract must be violated to make the workplace safer).
You two, of course, use two very different styles to attempt to make the same point. No one would ever expect that you two are working as say part of the same management team to promote this idea to "transform" (where have I heard that word?) the culture at UPS.
Of course there is no way this could be true...right???
Something to ponder.
I agree with your disagreement of a disagreement.
Don't you think? ...Or don't you?
Now rate my post agree.
Then you would be agreeing with my agreement of disagreeing with a disagreement.
Separate names with a comma.