fishtm2001
Well-Known Member
Billie donald supportersCouldn’t be MAGA, we all know MAGA hats are red.
Billie donald supportersCouldn’t be MAGA, we all know MAGA hats are red.
And, she attended the inauguration of the man who spent two years shouting "lock her up!"Hillary Clinton conceded the day after the *ing election, dude.
Billie donald supporters
Wrong !!!Affidavits are not evidence. Ttku...
Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events are not always true or credible.Wrong !!!
Are you aware that most of the submitted affidavits in donald lawsuits alleged they heard someone say there was fraud, but didn’t have a first-hand account. Hearsay is not admissible in court.Affidavits and eyewitnesses are always evidence in court along with video !!!!
Not interpretations , they were eyewitnesses , they were there and had seen things !!! Video and eyewitnesses are basically all you have as evidence in court !!!Plaintiffs’ interpretation of events are not always true or credible.
Hearsay sounds like the Mueller investigationAre you aware that most of the submitted affidavits in donald lawsuits alleged they heard someone say there was fraud, but didn’t have a first-hand account. Hearsay is not admissible in court.
noHearsay sounds like the Mueller investigation
Some hearsay true I agree !!! Some were there and witnessed these things for themselves and also there is video . If you would have had that during the kavanaugh case he would have been doomed !!!Are you aware that most of the submitted affidavits in donald lawsuits alleged they heard someone say there was fraud, but didn’t have a first-hand account. Hearsay is not admissible in court.
It’s best to have evidence then have affidavits into confirming the evidence. Show the videos.Not interpretations , they were eyewitnesses , they were there and had seen things !!! Video and eyewitnesses are basically all you have as evidence in court !!!
Affidavits that contain vague or second-hand accounts may be hard to prove as false. So, signing one isn't a legal slam dunk. There are many scenarios where a witness just misunderstands the situation or is mistaken in what they believe they heard or saw. That's why judges dismissed the stacks of papers waved around by Rudy the unhinged.Not interpretations , they were eyewitnesses , they were there and had seen things !!! Video and eyewitnesses are basically all you have as evidence in court !!!
WDFDHillary Clinton conceded the day after the *ing election, dude.
The someone who was climbing through the window of a barricaded door.Every cop there saw a roaring crowd. Only one cop decided to kill someone.
I’m guessing that since you’re not a cop that’s easy to say.If I'm a cop, take my gun away if I ever decide to kill an unarmed girl.
I don’t remember any controversy to H W ‘s election. Bush-Gore was much closer than this election. Gore had class though. Nobody had ever stormed the capital before.WDFD
Democrats have objected to certifying the electoral votes of the last three Republican presidential winners. This is just where we are now.
Isn't it funny how things flip around all the time !!! Now you're defending the cops so now they should have guns and they should shoot unarmed people !!! HilariousI’m guessing that since you’re not a cop that’s easy to say.
This is where in discussions with Republican voters you run into the delusion issue. It’s very difficult to have discussions with people who reject objective reality. democratic political leadership have accepted every Republican presidency.Yawn, nothing new here.
Democrats didn't accept the results of the 2016 election, this is just where we're at now.
There’s that..... A BARRICADED DOOR. You would think someone climbing through a window of a barricaded door where capital police had guns drawn might have bad intentions.The someone who was climbing through the window of a barricaded door.