Storming the Capitol

Seymour Packages

Well-Known Member
Gold
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210110-030033_(1).png
    Screenshot_20210110-030033_(1).png
    1.3 MB · Views: 69

Big Rigger

Well-Known Member
The DC mayor was begging for help from the Pentagon to help put down a violent insurrection at the Capitol. It took a couple hours for the DC National Guard to organize and put down the rebellion along with several police agencies. Since than 6 states have sent troops to DC to protect the government.
she was already ordering in the national guard on Monday and it was covered in the nedia. she knew the crowd was coming and in a very big way. she allowed minimal protection for the buildings but a whole lot less than she responded with her blm bros and sisters when they were destroying property this summer. they all knew a storm was brewing, the huge amount of americans that were really angry and that it was going to be a day of unknowns so she allowed the doors to opened hoping to eclipse the destruction her folks did.
why didn't the police gas or spray the folks coming threw the doors and windows? shot one to death, not in the building, unarmed so I guess that's ok?
try shooting someone to death trying to climb into your house through a window, unarmed, and mostly outside and see what the courts say.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
The cases weren't dismissed for lack of evidence, I know that can be hard to accept. The Judges, particularly the Trump appointees, had no real reason not to allow the cases to go to discovery. If there wasn't sufficient evidence after discovery to establish standing, then dismiss the case without controversy. Wonder why they wouldn't allow discovery.
Republican voters are objectively detached from reality. This poster illustrates the absurdity of all of this bs. the poster asked THE question why wouldn’t trump appointed judges not at least look into. why would trump appointed judges help the all powerful cheat trump out of the presidency? They are addicted to this myth of an all powerful left that does what it wants and it out to destroy them and America.
 

refineryworker05

Well-Known Member
she was already ordering in the national guard on Monday and it was covered in the nedia. she knew the crowd was coming and in a very big way. she allowed minimal protection for the buildings but a whole lot less than she responded with her blm bros and sisters when they were destroying property this summer. they all knew a storm was brewing, the huge amount of americans that were really angry and that it was going to be a day of unknowns so she allowed the doors to opened hoping to eclipse the destruction her folks did.
why didn't the police gas or spray the folks coming threw the doors and windows? shot one to death, not in the building, unarmed so I guess that's ok?
try shooting someone to death trying to climb into your house through a window, unarmed, and mostly outside and see what the courts say.
Another conspiracy, the DC mayor allowed rioting because she wanted more destruction caused by trump rioters than than the DC riots this summer. How the hell did the mayor of dc know,trump supporters would riot? And doesn’t the federal government protect federal property and not the local dc police? don’t federal leaders(the potus) organize that level of protection and not the DC mayor? Plus There were no riots in DC during the Blm protests, there were heavily armed national guards out there. This poster is making up stuff. Republican voters are dedicated to these nonsensical conspiracies. Smh.
 

The Driver

I drive.
try shooting someone to death trying to climb into your house through a window, unarmed, and mostly outside and see what the courts say.
If they breach the interior of my home they’ll be gunned down without mercy.

Ashli Babbitt breached the interior of the Capitol against lawful orders by a police officer. She was neutralized legally. The officer will be not be found criminally responsible.
 

over9five

Moderator
Staff member
If they breach the interior of my home they’ll be gunned down without mercy.

Ashli Babbitt breached the interior of the Capitol against lawful orders by a police officer. She was neutralized legally. The officer will be not be found criminally responsible.
Do you think he's proud of himself for killing an unarmed girl? Think he'll get a medal?
Why was he the only cop to shoot someone? Why didn't the other hundred cops "do their job"?
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Where's the evidence? Some guy heard some other guy who works at the PO or at the voting precinct who said that some other guy did something nefarious with a ballot somewhere. You've got to be smoking the supervisor's stash to believe that unsubstantiated baloney. Trump lost, fair and square. Get over it. Now work to get your guy elected next cycle. By work, I don't mean whining on BC that your one vote was stolen by that guy at the PO. Volunteer for your local party organization and go knock on doors or seal envelopes for mass mailers, or how about just stop whining? Just a suggestion. Might make you feel better, get your mind off the fact that your candidate lost. Fair and square.
He's too lazy. Much easier to believe the other side cheated.
 

bacha29

Well-Known Member
Thousands of signed affidavits for one. Voting irregularities that suggest an algorithm was used. But we'll never know because courts refused to hear cases. And by the way due to not following rules set by state legislatures, or last minute changes to said rules, the elections of several states should've been invalidated for not following the Constitution.
In every single case the plaintiffs either lacked standing or failed to meet the burden of proof. As for rule changes, In Pennsylvania in response to the pandemic the GOP controlled state legislature sponsored and passed and sent to the governor the bill that provided for mail in ballots along with the belief that it would help Trump. Well, it didn't. Pa won it for Biden and as soon as it won for Biden the GOP ran off to the Pa Supreme Court and sought to have mail in ballots thrown out. Only one problem. The time line for challenging the constitutionality of their own bill had expired.

If wide spread organized voter fraud you claim to exist really did exist then the failure to provide to the attorneys who were arguing in your behalf the evidence required to meet the burden of proof is on you as much as it is anyone else.
 

The Driver

I drive.
Do you think he's proud of himself for killing an unarmed girl? Think he'll get a medal?
Why was he the only cop to shoot someone? Why didn't the other hundred cops "do their job"?
He used only as much force as was necessary to stop that particular mass of criminals from continuing into the building. He bought some more time for the Congress to firm up their defensive posture in hiding.

He :censored2:ing did his job. I'm saddened that she might made that choice to be a :censored2: idiot but that cop was justified in putting the kibosh on the insanity, at least for as much time as possible.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
How do you know he's a crook? Aren't we all innocent until proven guilty? I searched and found no record of any convictions.
And you'll never find any as the Democrats and the Media cover for him. Tell me again how he affords all those mansions on his salary? Must be a hell of a penny saver.
 

fishtm2001

Well-Known Member
In every single case the plaintiffs either lacked standing or failed to meet the burden of proof. As for rule changes, In Pennsylvania in response to the pandemic the GOP controlled state legislature sponsored and passed and sent to the governor the bill that provided for mail in ballots along with the belief that it would help Trump. Well, it didn't. Pa won it for Biden and as soon as it won for Biden the GOP ran off to the Pa Supreme Court and sought to have mail in ballots thrown out. Only one problem. The time line for challenging the constitutionality of their own bill had expired.

If wide spread organized voter fraud you claim to exist really did exist then the failure to provide to the attorneys who were arguing in your behalf the evidence required to meet the burden of proof is on you as much as it is anyone else.
Notice that Van was fine with his home state of Texas making similar changes to election procedures.
 
Top