Storming the Capitol

[over9five]

 

[newfie]

There is a signed affidavit she was in possession of a pipe bomb. A white supremacist grabbed it from her as she lay bleeding on the floor.

there is no such evidence. you're a liar

 

[over9five]

Cops are "heroes", remember?

This cop was judge, jury, and executioner.

 

[newfie]

These cuckservatives sure do love the police.

antifa

 

[newfie]

You don’t see the difference between shooting someone 7 times in the back during a traffic stop and 1 shot to stop a violent mob from over running the last defense of the House of Representatives?

there was no mob running at that cop there was one unarmed woman crossing through a window

 

[bottomups]

there is no such evidence. you're a liar

Nope. Rudy has said affidavit.

 

[bottomups]

This cop was judge, jury, and executioner.

So was this one. Where was your outrage then?

 

[newfie]

Affidavits are not evidence. Ttku...

um yes they are ttku

 

[over9five]

View attachment 324236
So was this one. Where was your outrage then?

I was very outraged, how 'bout yourself?

 

[newfie]

The courts swa no evidence to continue. Ttku...

the courts refused to see the evidence ttku

 

[vantexan]

In every single case the plaintiffs either lacked standing or failed to meet the burden of proof. As for rule changes, In Pennsylvania in response to the pandemic the GOP controlled state legislature sponsored and passed and sent to the governor the bill that provided for mail in ballots along with the belief that it would help Trump. Well, it didn't. Pa won it for Biden and as soon as it won for Biden the GOP ran off to the Pa Supreme Court and sought to have mail in ballots thrown out. Only one problem. The time line for challenging the constitutionality of their own bill had expired.

If wide spread organized voter fraud you claim to exist really did exist then the failure to provide to the attorneys who were arguing in your behalf the evidence required to meet the burden of proof is on you as much as it is anyone else.

Wasn't widespread. Very targeted. And judges and election officials made last second changes in PA and elsewhere. Not constitutional.

 

[newfie]

she was already ordering in the national guard on Monday and it was covered in the nedia. she knew the crowd was coming and in a very big way. she allowed minimal protection for the buildings but a whole lot less than she responded with her blm bros and sisters when they were destroying property this summer. they all knew a storm was brewing, the huge amount of americans that were really angry and that it was going to be a day of unknowns so she allowed the doors to opened hoping to eclipse the destruction her folks did.
why didn't the police gas or spray the folks coming threw the doors and windows? shot one to death, not in the building, unarmed so I guess that's ok?
try shooting someone to death trying to climb into your house through a window, unarmed, and mostly outside and see what the courts say.

plenty of video out there that shows the police opened the doors and let them in.

 

[vantexan]

Notice that Van was fine with his home state of Texas making similar changes to election procedures.

Texas isn't my home state and I'm perfectly fine with any state violating the Constitution having it's election results invalidated. Let's have another election in those states. Whoops, too late, it's over.

 

[newfie]

Nope. Rudy has said affidavit.

nope never happened.

 

[vantexan]

View attachment 324236
So was this one. Where was your outrage then?

Damn murderous Democrat.

 

[1989]

View attachment 324235

Both are terrible. Pound for pound (death per minute) the coo on the capital was far more dangerous/deadlier than all the other riots combined the last 7 months. Total dead should be a metric not just shooting deaths.

 

[Indecisi0n]

I found it rather ironic and funny that the lady from Kennesaw Georgia that got trampled to death on Wednesday,
was carrying a flag that read "Don't Tread On Me".

View attachment 324202

If only those people could read.

 

[bacha29]

Republican voters are objectively detached from reality. This poster illustrates the absurdity of all of this bs. the poster asked THE question why wouldn’t trump appointed judges not at least look into. why would trump appointed judges help the all powerful cheat trump out of the presidency? They are addicted to this myth of an all powerful left that does what it wants and it out to destroy them and America.

Lacking policy and vision the only tool the GOP has left in order to hold onto it's base is to instill and deep sense of fear of the left into the minds of it's base. It's pure mind control.

 

[refineryworker05]

Lacking policy and vision the only tool the GOP has left in order to hold onto it's base is to instill and deep sense of fear of the left into the minds of it's base. It's pure mind control.

And that’s the question what do Republican voters want from the Republican Party cause it not really policy. I think they want to be fed these stories about an all powerful left controlling everything and they are out to destroy republicans and America. It’s how they understand everything in politics.

 

[1989]

um yes they are ttku

Affidavits can be deemed as hearsay. Using affidavits in order to find the evidence is not evidence. Clams of fraud is not evidence. Perhaps post these affidavits so we can see the evidence.