DriveInDriѵeOut
Inordinately Right
Lol.
Another Trump failure.
Another Trump failure.
I disagree, she knows it's bs from day one, but knows how her mindless sheep will respond, when dealt, trying to force a delay or derail. Just my take. There is no honor among thieves.I think Jonesy answers the possible what happened but not the why . The only logical why is that feinstien does not believe the story and or she knows it wont hold water.
Maybe not the end of the week.Carefully orchestrated by the Liberal Dims in Cali.
If it was true, it would have been exposed in July 2018, 3 months ago.
Kavanaugh will be the newest SCOTUS judge by the end of the week.
I love a tent folder, please supply supporting facts on Moore.You had a case with Roy Moore but this is a sham. And who are you to convict without anything but hearsay anyways?
I was thinking sent to the Senate by week's end so not for sure but Senate should vote within a couple of weeks.Maybe not the end of the week.
Kavanaugh confirmed, and a false cloud over the court when the right cases appear. Book it.awesome they found a good democrat willing to throw herself on this grenade. lets see how it plays out.
Kavanaugh has already lied under oath several times, what's a little last-minute sexual-assault charge?
Lulz, he'll be confirmed real quick.
I give you the results of the Alabama election. You have to try pretty hard as a Republican to lose an election in Alabama. Enough people believed the allegations that they stayed home. If you're approaching from the angle that we're always right, they're always wrong you're eventually going to get burned by one of your own. The difference between the two parties in the last 40 years, if not longer, is when a Republican gets caught with his pants down he quickly resigns with quick pressure from the leadership. When a Democrat gets exposed he basically says "so?" per Ted Kennedy and Barney Frank, amongst others.I love a tent folder, please supply supporting facts on Moore.
You don’t seem to understand how this works,Reported
Allegations from 40 years, no proof or corroborative evidence to be offered as proof. My point is, this road never ends, don't fold your tent.I give you the results of the Alabama election. You have to try pretty hard as a Republican to lose an election in Alabama. Enough people believed the allegations that they stayed home. If you're approaching from the angle that we're always right, they're always wrong you're eventually going to get burned by one of your own. The difference between the two parties in the last 40 years, if not longer, is when a Republican gets caught with his pants down he quickly resigns with quick pressure from the leadership. When a Democrat gets exposed he basically says "so?" per Ted Kennedy and Barney Frank, amongst others.
Exactly how do you know what I said? Aren't you the one that has cautioned people of talking about those actions.You don’t seem to understand how this works,
.
One is allowed to call a public figure a name or a perforative, if you want to talk fancy. You can even accuse them of a crime, or accuse them of a crime, ie: Hillary.
You just cannot call a fellow forum member a name, or refer to them in a perjoratve.
Like that couldn't be anticipated.Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) became the first Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee to suggest it delay moving forward with Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation amid allegations the judge sexually assaulted a woman as a teenager.
Flake, a member of the committee, said Sunday that he would not be “comfortable” moving forward now that Christine Blasey Ford has revealed herself as the woman behind a letter detailing the allegations.
“If they push forward without any attempt with hearing what she’s had to say, I’m not comfortable voting yes ... we need to hear from her,” Flake told Politico Sunday. “And I don’t think I’m alone in this.”
Jeff Flake Suggests Delaying Kavanaugh Vote Amid Sexual Assault Allegations
I guess I missed the link to the lies, I've pissed folks off demanding supporting documentation. Press them.what lies ?
Just as soon as I heard the "victim" is a California college professor I knew this was an attempt to save Roe vs Wade.I think Jonesy answers the possible what happened but not the why . The only logical why is that feinstien does not believe the story and or she knows it wont hold water.
It's larger than that.Just as soon as I heard the "victim" is a California college professor I knew this was an attempt to save Roe vs Wade.
I guess I missed the link to the lies, I'vefolks off demanding supporting documentation. Press them.
Great, let my guy give her a polygraph.The Post said it reviewed notes from a couple's therapist that Ford visited that say she reported in 2012 she was attacked by students who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” The paper said Ford’s attorney also provided the results of a polygraph exam that indicated she was being truthful.
Report: Christine Blasey Ford, Brett Kavanaugh’s Accuser, Passed Polygraph