The Former Guy sues the internet

Sportello

Well-Known Member
E539q-GXMAMMxcx
 

PT 4 Life

Most-Hated Member
I could see how a stupid left wingers with a room temp IQ would say that. You people are used to seeing waaah racism as the only argument made, this is a coherent argument against authority reaches of government into the private sector.

it’s a privately owned business and they have brand to protect. I actually disagree about the banning part, because everyone should have the right to speech even if it’s absurd.
 

Re-Raise

Well-Known Member
I could see how a stupid left wingers with a room temp IQ would say that. You people are used to seeing waaah racism as the only argument made, this is a coherent argument against authority reaches of government into the private sector.
You do know he won’t win this lawsuit either?




You probably don’t know that.
 

Sportello

Well-Known Member
it’s a privately owned business and they have brand to protect. I actually disagree about the banning part, because everyone should have the right to speech even if it’s absurd.
The first amendment only applies to the government limiting speech. If you start a website and decide you don’t want me on it, you can ban me. There’s nothing I can do. What you are describing should never happen in America.
 

PT 4 Life

Most-Hated Member
The first amendment only applies to the government limiting speech. If you start a website and decide you don’t want me on it, you can ban me. There’s nothing I can do. What you are describing should never happen in America.
Yeah this is the truth unfortunately
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
So. What’s your point?
The guy was a damn good leader.
I’d vote for him again.

I hate to make fun of the POTUS , but even the most ardent Biden supporter has got to feel bad for the guy. Forget his pitiful policies, he can not speak in coherent sentences , he makes a fool of himself every time he tries to read the screen., and he really doesn’t even know what he’s reading.
Scary times.
 

PT 4 Life

Most-Hated Member
Why unfortunately? You have the right to speech, but you can’t compel me to publish it.

because it sparks discussion and it honestly looks weak when you have to ban people over an opinion. I think these Maga guys are tools but they’re allowed to an opinion. I’d fight for that right.
 

BrownFlush

Woke Racist Reigning Ban King
because it sparks discussion and it honestly looks weak when you have to ban people over an opinion. I think these Maga guys are tools but they’re allowed to an opinion. I’d fight for that right.
Is that a light at the end of the tunnel......no, wait , that's a train.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The first amendment only applies to the government limiting speech. If you start a website and decide you don’t want me on it, you can ban me. There’s nothing I can do. What you are describing should never happen in America.
The only real recourse if we don't like how Twitter and others handle their business is to boycott their business. Take our discussions elsewhere. Start our own social media website. Oh, wait, was tried. And shut down. For that they should lose their Section 230 exemption. Can run their corner of the internet however they like. But when they try to monopolize social media...
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
The first amendment only applies to the government limiting speech. If you start a website and decide you don’t want me on it, you can ban me. There’s nothing I can do. What you are describing should never happen in America.
Nope.
The courts have already ruled common carriers are places of public accommodation and should be required to be neutral conveyors of other people's speech.

The idea that at&t with 80 million customers is a common carrier, but Facebook with almost 3 billion isn't, is complete idiocy.
 
Last edited:

Re-Raise

Well-Known Member
The only real recourse if we don't like how Twitter and others handle their business is to boycott their business. Take our discussions elsewhere. Start our own social media website. Oh, wait, was tried. And shut down. For that they should lose their Section 230 exemption. Can run their corner of the internet however they like. But when they try to monopolize social media...
I wonder why the entertainment industry, and most of the people intelligent enough to form social media companies seem to lean liberal?

I guess the MAGA crowd run all of the cigarette shops and buffets?
 
Top