The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming!

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
Compare us with the British Empire. Did we send troops into dozens of countries to completely dominate them? We have been the most benevolent superpower in history. Guys like you can't seem to grasp that.
Yes, we did and have done that. And yes, we are the most benevolent empire ever.

There you go again, asserting things I agree with as if I didn't.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member

We assembled a world tour of firepower for the express purpose of threatening anyone who would question our will in SE Asia. Lol.

Of course we are more benevolent imperialists than Japs or Chinks.

But the aggression and imperialism is there nonetheless, and all the predictable consequences of it.
So? That in no way meant we controlled those countries. 16 ships? So what?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Yes, we did and have done that. And yes, we are the most benevolent empire ever.

There you go again, asserting things I agree with as if I didn't.
Name the countries we have sent troops into and controlled and have been controlling for decades and hundreds of years? I mean real countries like India, South Africa, Vietnam? Come on, show us the white administrations and court systems like the British set up. You made the assertion, show where we muscled the French out of French Indochina and took over? Show a lot more than a naval tour of the world.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The world got the point. It's predictable that you don't.
The British in the early 1900's were much more dominant than we were and controlled much, much more of the world. You have an ethnocentric view that believes the world revolves around us and has for a very long time. We've had our time and due to mismanagement are on the brink of losing a lot of influence in the world.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
The British in the early 1900's were much more dominant than we were and controlled much, much more of the world. You have an ethnocentric view that believes the world revolves around us and has for a very long time. We've had our time and due to mismanagement are on the brink of losing a lot of influence in the world.
The whole world has an ethnocentric view, and the joke is on you for not following suit.
 

wilberforce15

Well-Known Member
The British in the early 1900's were much more dominant than we were and controlled much, much more of the world. You have an ethnocentric view that believes the world revolves around us and has for a very long time. We've had our time and due to mismanagement are on the brink of losing a lot of influence in the world.
Just when I think a Boomer can't Boom any more, he Booms a new Booming record.

Tell me more how hegemony requires tophats on dudes physically present to be real domination.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
The whole world has an ethnocentric view, and the joke is on you for not following suit.
The whole world doesn't assert that their country is dominating everyone else and in spite of other countries controlling given areas the citizens of various countries believe that those countries are just figureheads and that their particular country, race, ethnicity is the real power behind the throne. That's not just ethno centrism it's delusion on a grand scale. Next thing you'll be telling us is Ukraine brought the Russian invasion on themselves for being friendly with the West. Oh, wait....
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
Just when I think a Boomer can't Boom any more, he Booms a new Booming record.

Tell me more how hegemony requires tophats on dudes physically present to be real domination.
It was British troops and navies subjugating other countries, not ours. You seem to believe other countries spent their blood and treasure conquering other lands then we just sauntered in and said we're taking over. Tell me again about these dozens of countries that were making deals with us at gunpoint when we never pointed guns at them? Maybe they were shaking in their boots at the sight of our white 16 ships?
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Name the countries we have sent troops into and controlled and have been controlling for decades and hundreds of years? I mean real countries like India, South Africa, Vietnam? Come on, show us the white administrations and court systems like the British set up. You made the assertion, show where we muscled the French out of French Indochina and took over? Show a lot more than a naval tour of the world.
You're living in it.
 

bottomups

Bad Moon Risen'
Rebellion against a domineering motherland isn't the same. If anything the British learned a lot from their mistakes in America and operated a good deal differently later.
We wiped Native American cultures along with their religions and took the land by force. That sounds imperialistic to me.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
We wiped Native American cultures along with their religions and took the land by force. That sounds imperialistic to me.
Much of that took place under the British. And we continued it. But tell me what economic deals did we strike at gunpoint with the Indians that had them working for us much like the British did in many countries? I understand your point but it wasn't the same as what happened with colonial powers dominating other countries.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member

"Russia said on Thursday the flagship of its Black Sea fleet was seriously damaged and its crew evacuated following an explosion that a Ukrainian official said was the result of a missile strike.

Russia's defence ministry said a fire on the Moskva missile cruiser caused ammunition to blow up, Interfax news agency reported.

It did not say what caused the fire but Maksym Marchenko, the Ukrainian governor of the region around the Black Sea port of Odesa, said the Moskva had been hit by two Ukrainian-made Neptune anti-ship cruise missiles.

"Neptune missiles guarding the Black Sea caused very serious damage," he said in an online post."
 
Top