No, they aren't. Russian separatists backed by Putin started that war.This is a discussion of Donbass and Ukraine.
In that matter, Ukraine is the aggressor.
No, they aren't. Russian separatists backed by Putin started that war.This is a discussion of Donbass and Ukraine.
In that matter, Ukraine is the aggressor.
You think they were unjustified in trying to leave or had bad reasons. That's fine.You're always assuming the ones trying to hold the country together are the tyrants. Not necessarily. The Confederacy for example was clinging to slavery. There's really nothing more tyrannical than that. And they were willing to kill for it.
If their right to their land is recognized, there is no fight at all.
Ukraine refused to recognize taht right, and started the fight to make them submit.
There are Ukrainians living in the Donbas too. What about their rights?If their right to their land is recognized, there is no fight at all.
Ukraine refused to recognize taht right, and started the fight to make them submit.
They declared themselves free. Then they were attacked. The order of operations matters.No, they aren't. Russian separatists backed by Putin started that war.
They have the right to live there under Donbass self-government if they like, or they can leave.There are Ukrainians living in the Donbas too. What about their rights?
They have the right to live there under Donbass self-government if they like, or they can leave.
It's only part of Ukraine because Ukraine points guns at them and claims ownership of it, lol.Why? Donbass isn't a country. That region is part of Ukraine.
So what are their causes for separation?
It's only part of Ukraine because Ukraine points guns at them and claims ownership of it, lol.
Correct. The US should always allow any state to leave the union peacefully that desires to do so.Are the parts of the American southwest that used to belong to Mexico part of the US points guns at them and claims ownership of it?
Correct. The US should always allow any state to leave the union peacefully that desires to do so.
A union created and maintained only by force is no union at all.
No, they are states because they want to be part of us. They've expressed no desire to leave.Our southwest states are only US states because they've got the guns of the US government pointed at them?
No, they are states because they want to be part of us. They've expressed no desire to leave.
But if they expressed that desire, I say it would be our obligation not to force them to stay.
Same with Donbass. And New Mexico. And the South. And Quebec. And everybody.
No, the South, and Donbass, and Quebec, and all of these separatist movements are not killing anyone until their right to self-government is denied.You believe that armed insurrection and the killing of fellow citizens is legit if a group of people feels like doing their own thing. Got it.
No, the South, and Donbass, and Quebec, and all of these separatist movements are not killing anyone until their right to self-government is denied.
This is the entire civil war:
Union: "Alright. You guys can go. We think you're wrong. But whatever. Bye." (the South then shoots exactly nobody)
Ukraine: "Alright. You guys can go. We think you're wrong. But whatever. Bye." (Donbass then shoots exactly nobody)
Etc. Etc. Etc.
The violence is caused by the authoritarianism and imperialism to deny self-government. If they recognize it, there is no war.
Why don't you go crazy and not kill people for self-government for once and find out?Countries would never work if that's how countries actually worked.
So the first attacker is the bad guy? OK, the Confederacy fired on the Union first at Fort Sumter in Charleston, SC.You think they were unjustified in trying to leave or had bad reasons. That's fine.
But they absolutely had the right to leave without being attacked.
A country doesn't lose the right to self-government by having self-government you don't like.
The act of war was the North's invasion of a declared, sovereign, independent republic.So the first attacker is the bad guy? OK, the Confederacy fired on the Union first at Fort Sumter in Charleston, SC.
No, the South, and Donbass, and Quebec, and all of these separatist movements are not killing anyone until their right to self-government is denied.
This is the entire civil war:
Union: "Alright. You guys can go. We think you're wrong. But whatever. Bye." (the South then shoots exactly nobody)
Ukraine: "Alright. You guys can go. We think you're wrong. But whatever. Bye." (Donbass then shoots exactly nobody)
Etc. Etc. Etc.
The violence is caused by the authoritarianism and imperialism to deny self-government. If they recognize it, there is no war.
Countries would never work if that were how countries actually worked.
Why don't you go crazy and not kill people for self-government for once and find out?