Are you saying if it's within their own borders it's ok?theyre slaughtering millions outside of their country?
Are you saying if it's within their own borders it's ok?theyre slaughtering millions outside of their country?
Right and I don’t disagree that we probably don’t target civilians, but some of our actions make me question our reason for ever being in some of the conflicts we are in.I agree with that but it's popular in certain groups to say the U.S. killed a million Iraqis or more when every study of what actually happened comes up dramatically short of that. Or to say that we purposely target civilians. I think we shouldn't have invaded Iraq but as I see it there were a couple of good things that did come out of it. The war drew in a lot of Muslim extremists from many countries which we eliminated. And local Iraqis changed over to our side when they saw the extremists were much worse than us. Of course leave it to a Democratic administration to come in and muck everything up giving rise to ISIS and Iraq coming under the influence of Iran.
no. but a persons influence is highest when criticizing their own govt. i think it takes extra nerve to slaughter ppl in another country when its going to be harder for them to protest you. see many americans are confused because their govt is slaughtering ppl abroad. if americans were slaughtered by their own govt, maybe theyd be able to see the matrix betterAre you saying if it's within their own borders it's ok?
domination and theft of resources?Right and I don’t disagree that we probably don’t target civilians, but some of our actions make me question our reason for ever being in some of the conflicts we are in.
True, Iraq certainly didn't seem about 9/11. And we stretched out Afghanistan way beyond how long we should've been there. That we left $85 billion in military equipment says it all to me. The government doesn't produce that equipment. We pay contractors, the military-industrial complex, to do that. $85 billion in equipment just sitting there. Afghanistan must have been a very profitable war for the contractors.Right and I don’t disagree that we probably don’t target civilians, but some of our actions make me question our reason for ever being in some of the conflicts we are in.
Where are we currently slaughtering people abroad? And you said millions. Where have we slaughtered millions? Vietnam maybe.no. but a persons influence is highest when criticizing their own govt. i think it takes extra nerve to slaughter ppl in another country when its going to be harder for them to protest you. see many americans are confused because their govt is slaughtering ppl abroad. if americans were slaughtered by their own govt, maybe theyd be able to see the matrix better
dont fall for the matrixThen you are an ignoramus.
Maybe, but some of the people involved could just be misguided. Life is not always just black-and-white. I would definitely say Putin is the black. But some of the things we’ve done in the name of both retribution and nation building have turned out disastrous for the citizens of those countries. Sometimes the road to hell is paved with good intentions but you still end up in hell. We should always question “are we the white hatWe should always question are we always the good guys” with our actions.domination and theft of resources?
appeasing military industrial complex (russia ukraine invasion prime example)
i posted how many dead from kim dotcom beforeWhere are we currently slaughtering people abroad? And you said millions. Where have we slaughtered millions? Vietnam maybe.
cheney and bush were definitely black. obama was a wolf in sheeps clothing. pretty sure trump and biden were black. trump is a maroon and biden has mental problems. putin is black, his invasion of ukraine is preemptive war crime much like cheney and bush invasion of iraq, however we can understand why he did it which is nato expansion.Maybe, but some of the people involved could just be misguided. Life is not always just black-and-white. I would definitely say Putin is the black. But some of the things we’ve done in the name of both retribution and nation building have turned out disastrous for the citizens of those countries. Sometimes the road to hell is paved with good intentions but you still end up in hell.
People dying in regional conflicts isn't the same as the U.S. attacking and killing them directly. Our country took sides. Primarily to stop communism.i posted how many dead from kim dotcom before
![]()
Climate Change: Amplifying Feedbacks from Land and Ocean May Render Emission Reductions Insufficient - Global Research
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch. *** While the world, for very good reasons, is relying on medical...www.globalresearch.ca
"The extensive loss of life in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Libya is not included in this study."
Name one time NATO has attacked Russia during its existence?cheney and bush were definitely black. obama was a wolf in sheeps clothing. pretty sure trump and biden were black. trump is a maroon and biden has mental problems. putin is black, his invasion of ukraine is preemptive war crime much like cheney and bush invasion of iraq, however we can understand why he did it which is nato expansion.
Like Trump or hate Trump, he did not start major conflicts while he was in office. Unless you consider mean tweets.cheney and bush were definitely black. obama was a wolf in sheeps clothing. pretty sure trump and biden were black. trump is a maroon and biden has mental problems. putin is black, his invasion of ukraine is preemptive war crime much like cheney and bush invasion of iraq, however we can understand why he did it which is nato expansion.
i dont know but its a hostile military allianceName one time NATO has attacked Russia during its existence?
yea i forgot to mention that but he did maintain them which was like 5 or 7. obama brought us up to 5 or 7 wars. trump also sold weapons to ukraine i believe which increased tensions with russia, obama was smart enough not to do that. i think idiot liberals made trump more hostile to russia with all their red scare 2016 nonsense.Like Trump or hate Trump, he did not start major conflicts while he was in office. Unless you consider mean tweets.
Name one time NATO has attacked Russia during its existence?
The Castro's and company killed tens of thousands of Cubans, caused hundreds of thousands to flee. And attempted to put nuclear missiles in close proximity to us with Soviet help. NATO has been a defensive alliance to restrict Russian aggression. Two very different scenarios.i dont know but its a hostile military alliance
name one time cuba attacked america during its existence?
if it was bad for them, then its bad for you. and if its not, then were being hypocrites
One would have to wonder if he had conquered Ukraine how long would it be until he was in Eastern Europe if they weren't in NATO?![]()
How NATO's expansion helped drive Putin to invade Ukraine
Here is how the history of NATO, Russia and Ukraine got so complicated.www.npr.org
I would say Putin would tell you NATO did not hold up their end of the bargain in regards to NATO expansion. He’s probably right although I don’t think it gives him the right to do the things he’s doing.
Deflection with rhetorical nonsense noted.dont fall for the matrix
war is a game of propaganda. the "other guy" is always hitler. putin is bad, but we got him beat!
no no you got missiles in poland as we speak.The Castro's and company killed tens of thousands of Cubans, caused hundreds of thousands to flee. And attempted to put nuclear missiles in close proximity to us with Soviet help. NATO has been a defensive alliance to restrict Russian aggression. Two very different scenarios.