The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming!

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Actually far southern Brazil is known for the large German population along with the others you cited. Argentina is just over half Italian and they brought their economics with them. It's now in financial ruin. Uruguay and Chile are run pretty well. But I digress. In every Latin America country you have pockets of prosperity. It's not that the population doesn't want to do better. They have a history of strongmen hogging the wealth for themselves. Mexico is doing much better these days due to their population size and proximity to the U.S. A lot of development there. But still plenty of poverty. We shouldn't be shocked at a 40% poverty rate in a poor country when we ourselves are close to 20%.
no your system doesnt work better than any other system. ignorance is no excuse.

and were living in a capitalist bubble, when it pops because newsflash the system doesnt work, ppl will be cannibalizing each other and barbarity before extinction. theres a socialist phrase: socialism or barbarism.

yea we consume too much. especially the rich. we should be able to have a higher standard of living for all and a system which is environmentally sound.

we have re-education, you watch it daily the MSM and corporate media.
 
Last edited:

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Reagan didn't ignore law. And he was in his rights as president to fire the air traffic controllers.
"After the Second World War, business was terrified about the radicalization of the country during the Depression and then the war, and it started right off—Taft-Hartley was 1947—huge propaganda campaigns to demonize unions. It really—and it continued until you get to the Reagan administration.

Reagan was extreme. Beginning of his administration, one of the first things was to call in scabs—hadn’t been done for a long time, and it’s illegal in most countries—in the air controller strike. Reagan essentially—by “Reagan,” I mean his administration; I don’t know what he knew—but they basically told the business world that they’re not going to apply the labor laws. So, that means you can break unions any way you like. And in fact, the number of firing of union organizers, illegal firing, I think probably tripled during the Reagan years........

NOAM CHOMSKY: This deification of Reagan is extremely interesting and a very—it’s scandalous, but it tells a lot about the country. I mean, when Reagan left office, he was the most unpopular living president, apart from Nixon, even below Carter. If you look at his years in office, he was not particularly popular. He was more or less average. He severely harmed the American economy. When he came into office, the United States was the world’s leading creditor. By the time he left, it was the world’s leading debtor. He was fiscally totally irresponsible—wild spending, no fiscal responsibility. Government actually grew during the Reagan years.

He was also a passionate opponent of the free market. I mean, the way he’s being presented is astonishing. He was the most protectionist president in post-war American history. He essentially virtually doubled protective barriers to try to preserve incompetent U.S. management, which was being driven out by superior Japanese production.

During his years, we had the first major fiscal crises. During the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s, the New Deal regulations were still in effect, and that prevented financial crises. The financialization of the economy began to take off in the ’70s, but with the deregulation, of course you start getting crises. Reagan left office with the biggest financial crisis since the Depression: the home savings and loan."

 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
no your system doesnt work better than any other system. ignorance is no excuse.

and were living in a capitalist bubble, when it pops because newsflash the system doesnt work, ppl will be cannibalizing each other and barbarity before extinction. theres a socialist phrase: socialism or barbarism.

yea we consume too much. especially the rich. we should be able to have a higher standard of living for all and a system which is environmentally sound.

we have re-education, you watch it daily the MSM and corporate media.
Is the Chinese system environmentally sound? Do they have a higher standard of living for all?
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
You said average or median California home price is at a million dollars. Just say you were mistaken and move on lol.
OK, looked at it closer. The median price in Orange County as of March is just over a million dollars. The statewide median as of February is $796,000+. You were right, mea culpa. Either way it costs a lot to buy a house in California.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
That's actually not true. People seem to only think of California as LA and the Bay Area. Just speaking for NorCal, once you get up to the Sacramento area you can find plenty of big, nice homes under $700K in good neighborhoods.
Definitely got that wrong. But the median price for the whole state, half of houses above, half below, is $796,000+. With all the problems out there why anyone would pay those prices is beyond me.
 

baklava

I don’t work at UPS anymore.
Definitely got that wrong. But the median price for the whole state, half of houses above, half below, is $796,000+. With all the problems out there why anyone would pay those prices is beyond me.
I think it’s a lot of permanent capital buying up homes to rent out. It’s not only insanely expensive but insanely difficult to buy a home (at least in the Bay Area) if you’re not putting down all cash.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
I think it’s a lot of permanent capital buying up homes to rent out. It’s not only insanely expensive but insanely difficult to buy a home (at least in the Bay Area) if you’re not putting down all cash.
Saw the other day where some HOA's are fighting the investors who are buying up everything by requiring they live in the house at least 6 months after buying before renting it out.
 

DriveInDriѵeOut

Inordinately Right
OK, looked at it closer. The median price in Orange County as of March is just over a million dollars. The statewide median as of February is $796,000+. You were right, mea culpa. Either way it costs a lot to buy a house in California.
K.
But like I said, there are counties in California where the average price is less than the national average.

The victimhood mentality isn't reality.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Is the Chinese system environmentally sound? Do they have a higher standard of living for all?
Neither system works however at least china has good public transport in some places inclyding most of the worlds high speed rail. hows elon doing on that front?

Not sure wat country their standard of living comparable to but its rapidly rising unlike america which is no higher than 1973
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
Your notion of public transportation being the best mode for moving people about is only good in urban environments.
It does not make sense in rural or many coastal areas, where personal transportation is the best option.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Your notion of public transportation being the best mode for moving people about is only good in urban environments.
It does not make sense in rural or many coastal areas, where personal transportation is the best option.
personal transport is ridiculous. maybe there would be justification in a electric bike which is weather proof. but 1 person is a 4/5 seater car is ridiculous
 

Babagounj

Strength through joy
personal transport is ridiculous. maybe there would be justification in a electric bike which is weather proof. but 1 person is a 4/5 seater car is ridiculous
So your goal is to demoralize people who wish to express their independence by operating their own transportation mode and not be a burden of others.
 
Top