The Russians Are Coming, The Russians Are Coming!

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
the other choice is diplomacy which the US has been trying to undermine

Authoritarian dictators don't give a :censored2: about diplomacy unless they've already gotten what they want. I don't think you're dumb enough to not know that even if you won't admit it.

under the US led insistence on the experiment, this is one outcome. another outcome is nuclear war.

Cool. If the alternative to Putin being able to invade countries at will is nuclear war, let's do it. Let's see if those who keep him in power are willing to sacrifice their existence and Russia's existence for him.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Authoritarian dictators don't give a :censored2: about diplomacy unless they've already gotten what they want. I don't think you're dumb enough to not know that even if you won't admit it.



Cool. If the alternative to Putin being able to invade countries at will is nuclear war, let's do it. Let's see if those who keep him in power are willing to sacrifice their existence and Russia's existence for him.
russia agreed to diplomacy in afghan war which US also tried undermining. if that was true, then the guys i listen to wouldve not mentioned diplomacy

big reason putin invaded is because of an expanding aggressive, not defensive, hostile military alliance.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
Give me some examples of NATO's not defensive moves.
1654007008009.png

THERE was more countries too ive listed off before no where near eastern EU i will post here
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
Give me some examples of NATO's not defensive moves.
View attachment 386371
THERE was more countries too ive listed off before no where near eastern EU i will post here

LOL at you believing NATO's intervention in Kosovo and Serbia wasn't a defensive move. You a silly goose!


You realize that if the author actually believed NATO is at fault here he wouldn't have made the dumb suggestion that one has to "plumb the deep recesses of Putin's soul" to figure out why he invaded Ukraine, right?

Here you've got a case of a writer who knows that blaming NATO for Putin's invasion of Ukraine is obviously retarded. But he still supports Putin so he has to pretend his reasons for invading must be so deep and so profound that they're basically conveniently undiscoverable. What a tool.

And the URL of that piece indicates that its publication date is March 30, 2022. At that time Russian forces were still north of Kiev and Ukraine's readiness to declare neutrality and receive a security guarantee probably was their best option. But it's been 2 months since then. Russia has been pushed out of the north of Ukraine and continues its assault on the country's south and east. So pointing at the state of things as of March 30 and trying to apply them to right now seems to be for dumb dumb comrades.

Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine - Wikipedia
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
theyre also paying much higher gas and high target for nukes

you keep thinking NATO is defensive; its a hostile military alliance
Isn't NATO who's slaughtering civilians in Ukraine. You can cover for Russia all you want but they're the ones invading and killing.
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
LOL at you believing NATO's intervention in Kosovo and Serbia wasn't a defensive move. You a silly goose!



You realize that if the author actually believed NATO is at fault here he wouldn't have made the dumb suggestion that one has to "plumb the deep recesses of Putin's soul" to figure out why he invaded Ukraine, right?

Here you've got a case of a writer who knows that blaming NATO for Putin's invasion of Ukraine is obviously retarded. But he still supports Putin so he has to pretend his reasons for invading must be so deep and so profound that they're basically conveniently undiscoverable. What a tool.

And the URL of that piece indicates that its publication date is March 30, 2022. At that time Russian forces were still north of Kiev and Ukraine's readiness to declare neutrality and receive a security guarantee probably was their best option. But it's been 2 months since then. Russia has been pushed out of the north of Ukraine and continues its assault on the country's south and east. So pointing at the state of things as of March 30 and trying to apply them to right now seems to be for dumb dumb comrades.

Timeline of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine - Wikipedia
of all the people i listen to whether its abby martin, chris hedges, ralph nader, noam chomsky, lee camp, lawrence wilkerson, glenn greenwald etc, its all on NATO expansion and a little bit on putin's ego which is what im assuming "plumb the recesses of putin's soul" refers to. the article directly references US intelligence concerns on NATO expansion.

doesnt matter what date it is, US and other NATO countries lying about not expanding for 30 years doesnt change.
 

Box Ox

Well-Known Member
of all the people i listen to whether its abby martin, chris hedges, ralph nader, noam chomsky, lee camp, lawrence wilkerson, glenn greenwald etc, its all on NATO expansion and a little bit on putin's ego which is what im assuming "plumb the recesses of putin's soul" refers to. the article directly references US intelligence concerns on NATO expansion.

Mega weak, comrade.

jord.gif
 

rickyb

Well-Known Member
You can cover for Russia all you want but they're the ones invading and killing. Estimated 4-7 million died in Ukraine in 1932-1933 by forced upon them famine by Stalin. People have long memories.
why mister anderson whyyy

what does greenwald say hmmmm

nazis invaded poland then too. my granny fled it. what happened with germany post ww1? diplomacy did not prevail. led to ww2
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
why mister anderson whyyy

what does greenwald say hmmmm

nazis invaded poland then too. my granny fled it. what happened with germany post ww1? diplomacy did not prevail. led to ww2
No, Germany suffered from hyperinflation due to bad policy. Hitler rose to power convincing the Germans he could restore their economy. He became so popular that most Germans were swayed by his arguments of superiority and right to invade and dominate others. They paid dearly for it just as Russia is paying for supporting Putin who appealed to their nationalism and dreams of former domination of their neighbors.
 

vantexan

Well-Known Member
of all the people i listen to whether its abby martin, chris hedges, ralph nader, noam chomsky, lee camp, lawrence wilkerson, glenn greenwald etc, its all on NATO expansion and a little bit on putin's ego which is what im assuming "plumb the recesses of putin's soul" refers to. the article directly references US intelligence concerns on NATO expansion.

doesnt matter what date it is, US and other NATO countries lying about not expanding for 30 years doesnt change.
And if Russia didn't do anything NATO would be at his doorstep without doing anything at all.
 
Top