Trump Is Copying Hitler’s Early Rhetoric and Policies

[newfie]

Polls have methodology. If there is liberal bias it wouldn’t be hard to find but you’re welcome to blindly label it as you see fit.

2016

 

[bbsam]

2016

Fox was a liberal poll in 2016.

Ok

 

[BadIdeaGuy]

2016

President Trump only won by 77 electoral votes, and 10 states more than Clinton.
The polls totally called that one.

It's not like there were even newspapers printed that prereported that Hillary won the election...
Madam President: how Newsweek reported a Clinton victory

 

[newfie]

Fox was a liberal poll in 2016.

Ok

Polls were way wrong in 2016. Dense much?

 

[bbsam]

Polls were way wrong in 2016. Dense much?

Nobody says they weren’t.

Are you saying then that from here on out, polls are always wrong?

Are you starting to see how ignorant your statements are?

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

President Trump only won by 77 electoral votes, and 10 states more than Clinton.
The polls totally called that one.

It's not like there were even newspapers printed that prereported that Hillary won the election...
Madam President: how Newsweek reported a Clinton victory

Polls correctly predicted Trump's loss of the popular vote.

 

[BadIdeaGuy]

Polls correctly predicted Trump's loss of the popular vote.

So polls are designed to be worthless, and not reflect election results?
Good to know.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

So polls are designed to be worthless, and not reflect election results?
Good to know.

I'm glad you've finally figured out the popular vote does not elect the president.
Glad I could help you fren.

 

[It will be fine]

So polls are designed to be worthless, and not reflect election results?
Good to know.

There are many different polls. Crying “polls are bad” is as stupid as “the media is biased.” So right in line with uneducated Republican thought.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

i dont believe any poll at this point, the election is a year away and polls are worthless at this point.

They are relevant for DemWits vying for the nomination as the DemWit candidate.

 

[oldngray]

They are relevant for DemWits vying for the nomination as the DemWit candidate.

DNC will make sure Biden gets the nomination. Everything else is just for show.

 

[vantexan]

There are many different polls. Crying “polls are bad” is as stupid as “the media is biased.” So right in line with uneducated Republican thought.

Apparently uneducated Democrat thought includes believing the polls so much that the nominee doesn't bother to campaign in some states.

 

[vantexan]

DNC will make sure Biden gets the nomination. Everything else is just for show.

Unless Michelle runs.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Apparently uneducated Democrat thought includes believing the polls so much that the nominee doesn't bother to campaign in some states.

That's redundant!

 

[It will be fine]

That's redundant!

70% of republicans believe college has a negative effect on the nation. Republicans are the party of stupid. They should be eliminated and replaced with robots to do the farming.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

70% of republicans believe college has a negative effect on the nation. Republicans are the party of stupid. They should be eliminated and replaced with robots to do the farming.

Typical LibTurd ... Thinks that anybody that disagrees with them should be removed from society.
Most LibTurds are Fascist so your position is expected.

 

[DriveInDriveOut]

... Thinks that anybody that disagrees with them should be removed from society.

You've basically just summarized Trump's Twitter. Good job libturd.

 

[It will be fine]

Typical LibTurd ... Thinks that anybody that disagrees with them should be removed from society.
Most LibTurds are Fascist so your position is expected.

Robots will be better farmers than the pill popping hicks that do it now. It’s called progress.

 

[Old Man Jingles]

Robots will be better farmers than the pill popping hicks that do it now. It’s called progress.

Thank you Miss Fascist.

 

[dudebro]

If I wanted to be a fascist leader I would make sure that all my bitches made sure that as soon as someone compared me to Hitler, they would simply insist that comparisons to Hitler negate all arguments.

Why do you internet warriors believe that? Someone made it up. Or is it that someone observed that’s what happens in internet chat?

I don't need to be a "warrior" for this, just capable of rational thought.

Comparing someone who's rude on Twitter to someone who systematically killed millions of people in the worst ways imaginable is ridiculous. If one makes that argument, all the others they make are equally suspect.

If someone has a problem with a Trump policy, fine, state the problem with that policy, it shouldn't be too hard. But as soon as they ride in with Hitler they might as well be Alex Jones.