Always fun to see Tucker shed light on what liberals are doing.
David Frum slayed her.Always fun to see Tucker shed light on what liberals are doing.
He has zero credibility.Tucker Carlson has the most watched cable news program for a reason. He puts on a great show.
Didn't bother watching OP's little video, I'm sure it's stupid and deranged like all the other stuff he links to.
Then why do Leftists insist on shutting him down?He has zero credibility.
And yet everyone wants to watch his show. Seems to me that if he had zero credibility, no one would want to watch.He has zero credibility.
The uneducated watch Fox.And yet everyone wants to watch his show. Seems to me that if he had zero credibility, no one would want to watch.
The carnival barking donald needs your money.I can't wait to retire so I can post TDS and other liberal derangement all day.
It's that why you watch it so much?The uneducated watch Fox.
alot of ppl vote for hillary and bush and trump and they have near zero credibility.And yet everyone wants to watch his show. Seems to me that if he had zero credibility, no one would want to watch.
So your link says Rachel Maddow of MSNBC won a libel lawsuit against her by claiming no one would believe her show is factual.![]()
Judge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News
The “general tenor” of Carlson’s show is not “stating actual facts” about the topics he discusses, the judge wrote.slate.com
![]()
You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers
Fox News viewers don't expect facts from Tucker Carlson, according to network lawyers who defended their star in a slander lawsuit filed by a woman who said she had an affair with President Trump.www.npr.org
![]()
Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously
Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.www.businessinsider.com
Yes, that is the case precedent used by Fox to defend Tucker Carlson's show against a libel lawsuit."The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."
"The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."
I understand why you're confused sport, you left wingers think your opinions are facts.You lied when you said:
"no one would believe her show is factual"
"The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."
In a motion to dismiss the case, Maddow's attorneys allege Herrings Networks was not objecting to anything from the Daily Beast article, and conceded that Rouz worked for an organization affiliated with the Russian government.
Poor confused DIDO, statement and show are not the same, and it was conceded the statement was true. It's Russian propaganda, only a Putinist would say otherwise.You lied when you said:
"no one would believe her show is factual"
That's not what was said at all. She said OANN is Russian propaganda, and it is. Just like you are.