1
10 Pt
Guest
I was just joking with you.Actually, those are allowed ... in fact, mods use * to edit out a full word.
Another is friend*
All I found was this. I didn't tell on you though.
Boil some peanuts and you'll forget all about it.
I was just joking with you.Actually, those are allowed ... in fact, mods use * to edit out a full word.
Another is friend*
We, as employees, have limited exposure to who shares what with whom in HIPAA situations at work.What you state makes sense and that may even be the law.
My point was that this is not covered under HIPPA.
Hippa is 99% applicable to the provider and the employer is not the provider.
I would appreciate you posting a link to anywhere in HIPPA regulations that covers confidentiality responsibilities for the employer.
I found a case where a lawyers advice was pretty much what I posted and that's why I posted it.
My motto is don't post until you google and I spent over half an hour reading through the HIPPA site at HHS.gov
I stand by my statement until you or someone else provides a link that would correct my research.
Educate yourself:What you state makes sense and that may even be the law.
My point was that this is not covered under HIPPA.
Hippa is 99% applicable to the provider and the employer is not the provider.
I would appreciate you posting a link to anywhere in HIPPA regulations that covers confidentiality responsibilities for the employer.
I found a case where a lawyers advice was pretty much what I posted and that's why I posted it.
My motto is don't post until you google and I spent over half an hour reading through the HIPPA site at HHS.gov
I stand by my statement until you or someone else provides a link that would correct my research.
It's against the law for your doctor to discuss anything regarding your medical treatment with anyone that you have not authorized in writing.It's against the law to talk to someone?
Come on ... what you saying doesn't make any sense.
Geezus ... Nowhere in your reply does it cover the scenario under discussion.Educate yourself:
Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
What Information is Protected
Protected Health Information. The Privacy Rule protects all "individually identifiable health information" held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. The Privacy Rule calls this information "protected health information (PHI)."12
“Individually identifiable health information” is information, including demographic data, that relates to:
the individual’s past, present or future physical or mental health or condition,
the provision of health care to the individual, or
the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to the individual,
A major purpose of the Privacy Rule is to define and limit the circumstances in which an individual’s protected heath information may be used or disclosed by covered entities. A covered entity may not use or disclose protected health information, except either: (1) as the Privacy Rule permits or requires; or (2) as the individual who is the subject of the information (or the individual’s personal representative) authorizes in writing
It's against the law for your doctor to discuss anything regarding your medical treatment with anyone that you have not authorized in writing.
Like I said, call some of your old buddies and and tell them to do what you're suggesting, I'd be interested to hear how it works out.
I might be off base but I believe the root of his statement had to do with non-disclosure of an employee's medical info, the issue that local management don't get briefed on the basis for FMLA being approved and therefore it would take an employee divulging that info to his/her management to make the possibility of a center manager (or management person) being able to know which provider to call to move dates and times of appointments.Educate yourself:
Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
What Information is Protected
Protected Health Information. The Privacy Rule protects all "individually identifiable health information" held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. The Privacy Rule calls this information "protected health information (PHI)."12
“Individually identifiable health information” is information, including demographic data, that relates to:
the individual’s past, present or future physical or mental health or condition,
the provision of health care to the individual, or
the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to the individual,
A major purpose of the Privacy Rule is to define and limit the circumstances in which an individual’s protected heath information may be used or disclosed by covered entities. A covered entity may not use or disclose protected health information, except either: (1) as the Privacy Rule permits or requires; or (2) as the individual who is the subject of the information (or the individual’s personal representative) authorizes in writing
It's against the law for your doctor to discuss anything regarding your medical treatment with anyone that you have not authorized in writing.
Like I said, call some of your old buddies and tell them to do what you're suggesting, I'd be interested to hear how it works out.
You've gotten lost in your dope haze again, so let me remind you what we're talking about:Geezus ... Nowhere in your reply does it cover the scenario under discussion.
What a waste of time posting the text of the ing link I posted for you.
I read what you posted and about 20 times as much.
I think the reason I cannot find anything on this is because the scenario is not covered under HIPPA.
I suggest you go do some research and you can start here.
I am the employer. Can I call a doctor and veri - Q&A - Avvo
Like I said, go ahead and tell some your old buddies to try this.Remember that legally they have a right to inquire through certain channels. For instance they can ask your wife's doctor to reschedule appointments if its more convenient for their staffing. Look up employer's rights under FMLA, it's pretty interesting.
However I believe this is something HR would have to do, and not your local management person, like for instance your on car.
I can't believe Fragile's statement can you?You've gotten lost in your dope haze again, so let me remind you what we're talking about:
Like I said, go ahead and tell some your old buddies to try this.
You can tell your center manager who your doctor is, that's no big deal. But he absolutely cannot just call your doctor and start asking questions, rescheduling your appointments to suit his staffing, etc. Any Doctor who knows the law will just hang up on him.I might be off base but I believe the root of his statement had to do with non-disclosure of an employee's medical info, the issue that local management don't get briefed on the basis for FMLA being approved and therefore it would take an employee divulging that info to his/her management to make the possibility of a center manager (or management person) being able to know which provider to call to move dates and times of appointments.
Which is crazy ... by the way.
That is nuts.You can tell your center manager who your doctor is, that's no big deal. But he absolutely cannot just call your doctor and start asking questions, rescheduling your appointments to suit his staffing, etc. Any Doctor who knows the law will just hang up on him.
I'm pretty sure that if your boss tried to call your doctor to get him/her to reschedule your appointments (or for any reason at all) the lawyers would be lining up.
Just curious ... what would be the basis of the litigation?
Harassment?
Poor taste?
It would be a violation of HIPAA law for starters.
Honestly the doctor would simply refuse to discuss it as that would make them liable as well.
Seriously ... what would HIPPA have to do with this?
HIPPA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) appears to be concerned mostly with privacy.
If the center manager calls the doctor, that means the employee told the center manager the doctor's name, which means there is no privacy concerns.
My advice is to never tell your management what your (or wife's) medical condition and the doctors' names.
At UPS, FMLA is handled by an outside agency (AETNA, MetLife, etc.) and UPS and your local management should not have that information unless the employee told them.
Absolutely incorrect. You have to sign a release specifically allowing your employer access to your medical records. Just telling your employer who your doctor is doesn't count.
Educate yourself:
Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
What Information is Protected
Protected Health Information. The Privacy Rule protects all "individually identifiable health information" held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. The Privacy Rule calls this information "protected health information (PHI)."12
“Individually identifiable health information” is information, including demographic data, that relates to:
the individual’s past, present or future physical or mental health or condition,
the provision of health care to the individual, or
the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to the individual,
A major purpose of the Privacy Rule is to define and limit the circumstances in which an individual’s protected heath information may be used or disclosed by covered entities. A covered entity may not use or disclose protected health information, except either: (1) as the Privacy Rule permits or requires; or (2) as the individual who is the subject of the information (or the individual’s personal representative) authorizes in writing
It's against the law for your doctor to discuss anything regarding your medical treatment with anyone that you have not authorized in writing.
Geezus ... Nowhere in your reply does it cover the scenario under discussion.
What a waste of time posting the text of the link I posted for you.
I read what you posted and about 20 times as much.
I think the reason I cannot find anything on this is because the scenario is not covered under HIPPA.
I suggest you go do some research and you can start here.
I am the employer. Can I call a doctor and veri - Q&A - Avvo
First - You didn't tell me what we are talking about.You've gotten lost in your dope haze again, so let me remind you what we're talking about:
In all the time it took you to find those posts you could have simply gone back and read Fragile's post which is what I was responding to:First - You didn't tell me what we are talking about.
It's quite possible we are talking about different subjects.
So, since you didn't tell me what we are talking about ... I replied to each side of our conversation above.
These are posts 75, 77, 90, 96, 98, 103 and 104.
At this point, I will continue to research until I get sleepy but I'm not interested in what you have to say about this scenario as you don't appear to understand what is covered under HIPPA and what is not.
I mean, I quoted him and everything so if you didn't know what I was talking about I'm not sure how that's my fault...Remember that legally they have a right to inquire through certain channels. For instance they can ask your wife's doctor to reschedule appointments if its more convenient for their staffing. Look up employer's rights under FMLA, it's pretty interesting.
However I believe this is something HR would have to do, and not your local management person, like for instance your on car.
So you didn't read my original reply to your post?In all the time it took you to find those posts you could have simply gone back and read Fragile's post which is what I was responding to:
I mean, I quoted him and everything so if you didn't what I was talking about I'm not sure how that's my fault...
Just because you ran off the rails jabbering like a loon don't expect me to follow you.So you didn't read my original reply to your post?
Well excuse me.
I'll point it out in big red letter's next time.
or better yet, I'll start a new thread next time since you can't handle two lines of thought at the same time.
I've noted your limitation ... it won't happen again.Just because you ran off the rails jabbering like a loon don't expect me to follow you.
Yeah I've got a weakness for sticking to the facts...I've noted your limitation ... it won't happen again.
I use to believe that but lately ... SMHYeah I've got a weakness for sticking to the facts...
Off in your dope haze again...I use to believe that but lately ... SMH
Not yet.Off in your dope haze again...
I'm pretty sure that if your boss tried to call your doctor to get him/her to reschedule your appointments (or for any reason at all) the lawyers would be lining up.
Just curious ... what would be the basis of the litigation?
Harassment?
Poor taste?
It would be a violation of HIPAA law for starters.
Honestly the doctor would simply refuse to discuss it as that would make them liable as well.
You don't have to ... you already did.You've gotten lost in your dope haze again, so let me remind you what we're talking about: