Tie & mac,In this case I think the answer brennan gave was right on point, poor helen she has completely lost her mind.![]()
In this case I think the answer brennan gave was right on point, poor helen she has completely lost her mind.![]()
Tie & mac,
I believe Helen was pressing and hoping that the response would have been --"It is Bushes fault" Reality is finally settling in ---we have been at war with radical Islam for generations ---wheter we knew it or not![]()
It's a simple question with a simple answer...Why ? What motivates the Terrorists ?
Historic retention is rare around here...Greenwald simplifies the answer for you guys. And this time store it in your memory banks...
"It's true that religious fanaticism is a part of their collective motivation, but why can't he just say what's so obviously true: "they claim that the U.S. is interfering in, occupying and bringing violence to their part of the world, they cite things like civilian deaths and our support for Israel and Guantanamo and torture, and claim that their terrorism is in retaliation"?
Diesel96,
Sounds like the same ol same ol from you. Of course America has bought this on to themselves !!!!!
Gee --- Wait don't you dare say that I belong to the blame America crowd.
I lost a brother in law in NYC sept 11 TH ----I am now justified to blow up some Arab building ??? I think not.
If you listen to good old Bin LAden --His own words--hates us for what we are --hates our freedoms--we are dirty infidels.
You clearly want to simplify a very complex situation. The world continues to look to us after the English empire and the U.N totally screwed up the middle east -----all of our time put into peace-Presidents --Democrat and Republican with peace plan after peace plan--the foreign aid both in blood and treasure . They have warred with each other for centuries ---even if they blow us from the face of the earth --they will still fight.
But yet people still believe the USA is the root problem
This is as old as "I inherited this from BUSH" --theres an idea --just what Helen wanted to hear --It is Bushes fault. ?????
Let me ask you one simple question....do you think the US would have any interest in a desert thousands of miles away without oil ?
It was not Bin Laden, you must be lost in translation Island....It was Bush who says the terrorist "hate us for our fredoms"...that's something Sarah Palin would quote....lol
And speaking of the English....Do you feel Jefferson and the rest of our Founding Fathers aren't turning in the graves watching their country act like Ole' England intervening country after country. After 8 years of Bush and Cheney, I don't think the World approves of this niether. How do you believe the World is looking to us for anything, except humanitarian or business partners....
Why Are They at War With Us?
By Patrick J. Buchanan
"We are at war. We are at war against al-Qaida, a far-reaching network of violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people and that is plotting to strike us again."
Thus did Barack Obama clear the air as to whether we are at war, and with whom and why.
Following his remarks, during a White House briefing by National Security Council aide John Brennan, Helen Thomas asked a follow-up question to which we almost never hear an answer:
Why is al-Qaida at war with us? What is its motivation? It was Osama bin Laden himself, in his declaration of war in 1998, published in London, who gave al-Qaida's reasons for war:
First, the U.S. military presence on the sacred soil of Saudi Arabia. Second, U.S. sanctions causing terrible suffering among the Iraqi people. Third, U.S. support for Israel's dispossession of the Palestinians. "All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on God, his Messenger and Muslims," said Osama.
He began his fatwa quoting the Koran: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
To Osama, we started the war. Muslims, the ulema, must fight because America, with her "brutal crusade occupation of the (Arabian) Peninsula" and support for "the Jews' petty state" and "occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there" was waging war upon the Islamic world.
Terrorism, the direct killing of civilians for political ends, is al-Qaida's unconventional tactic, but its war aims are quite conventional.
Al-Qaida is fighting a religious war against apostates and pagans in their midst, a civil war against collaborators of the Crusaders and an anti-colonial war to drive us out of the Dar al-Islam. On Sept. 11, they were over here -- because we are over there.
Nothing justifies the massacre of Sept. 11. But these are the political goals behind the 9/11 attack, and this is why Islamists fare well in elections in the Middle East. Tens of millions of Muslims, who may despise terrorism, identify with the causes for which Osama declared war -- liberation of Muslim peoples from pro-American autocrats and Israeli occupiers.
Americans are being killed for the reasons Osama said we should be killed -- not because of who we are, but because of where we are and what we do.
Consider. America lost 4,000 soldiers in six years in Iraq, with 30,000 wounded. Yet not one American of the 125,000 soldiers in Iraq was killed in December. Why not? Because we no longer conduct raids, patrol streets, kick down doors and pat down suspects. We have ended our combat operations, withdrawn to desert bases and seem anxious to go home. When we stopped fighting and killing them, they stopped fighting and killing us.
Most Americans today appear content to let Shia and Sunni, Arab and Kurd decide the future of Iraq. And if they cannot settle their quarrels without a civil-sectarian war, why should their war be our war?
According to Gen. Barry McCaffrey, we must now prepare for 300 to 500 dead and wounded every month in Afghanistan by summer.
Why are the Taliban killing our soldiers? Because we threw them out of power, took over their country and imposed the Hamid Karzai regime, and our troops, some 100,000 by fall, are the force preventing them from recapturing their country. We will bleed in Afghanistan as long as we are in Afghanistan.
But if, as Obama said, "we are at war with al-Qaida," why are we fighting Taliban when al-Qaida is in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and North Africa?
Hamas has used terrorism, but not against us. Hezbollah has used terrorism, but not against us since the bombing of the Marine barracks, a quarter-century ago. And our Marines were attacked in Lebanon because we were in Lebanon, intervening in their civil-sectarian war. Had the Marines not been sent into the midst of that war, they would not have been targeted.
When Ronald Reagan withdrew them, the attacks stopped.
Like Europe's Thirty Years' War -- among Germans, French, Czechs, Dutch, Danes, Swedes, Scots and English, Catholics and Protestants, kings, princes and emperors -- the Muslim world is roiled by conflicts between pro-Western autocrats and Islamic militants, Sunni and Shia, modernists and obscurantists, nationalities, tribes and clans. The outcome of these wars, the future of their lands -- is that not their business, and not ours?
The Muslims stayed out of our Thirty Years' War. Perhaps we would do well to get out of theirs. But as long as we take sides in their wars, those we fight and kill over there will come to kill us over here.
This is payback for our intervention. This is the price of empire. This is the cost of the long war.
Why Are They at War With Us?
You beat me to it!
Island,
Consider Chalmers Johnson
YouTube- The BLOWBACK SYNDROME: Oil Wars and Overreach
Who is Chalmers Johnson ?
Kmac and JJ, Island's mind is made up.
Anyone who points out the truth behind WHY and WHAT motivates America's foes, is catergorized by Island as the "Blame America" crowd.
It's a simple question with a simple answer...Why ? What motivates the Terrorists ?
Historic retention is rare around here...Greenwald simplifies the answer for you guys. And this time store it in your memory banks...
"It's true that religious fanaticism is a part of their collective motivation, but why can't he just say what's so obviously true: "they claim that the U.S. is interfering in, occupying and bringing violence to their part of the world, they cite things like civilian deaths and our support for Israel and Guantanamo and torture, and claim that their terrorism is in retaliation"?
.It was not Bin Laden, you must be lost in translation Island....It was Bush who says the terrorist "hate us for our fredoms"...that's something Sarah Palin would quote....lol
Diesel,
The next time you fill up that motorcycle --you are a consumer ---that is mainly what we are guilty of --also --Please if we were like many of the "old empires " --We certainly would not be buying oil ---there would be no OPEC ---- We would own it ???
Kmac and JJ, Island's mind is made up.
Anyone who points out the truth behind WHY and WHAT motivates America's foes, is catergorized by Island as the "Blame America" crowd.
We are guilty of being consumers, well so is China, Russia, India and Brazil. I don't see those countries occupying land in the Middle East....Nor do I see them in support of Israel's ilegal expansion.....
It was not Bin Laden, you must be lost in translation Island....It was Bush who says the terrorist "hate us for our fredoms"...that's something Sarah Palin would quote....lol
...
The truth of the matter is, nations that produce oil need to sell it as much as we need to buy it.
When America stops unconditionally supporting Israel, pulls our troops out of the Middle East, and stops meddling in their internal affairs, there will be peace.
I have a hunch that we would also have cheaper energy prices.
I have seen the enemy and he is us.