I read more of it, he is focused on La Casa and genocide. Which is fine, the treatment of the natives wasn’t good. He is painting a picture of genocide destroying the populations though, which isn’t true. The main cause of native deaths was disease. He is doing this all from one source and neglecting others. He also threw out estimates of 8 million slaughtered which is unfounded.
“One reason these atrocities are still with us is that we have learned to bury them in a mass of other facts, as radioactive wastes are buried in containers in the earth. We have learned to give them exactly the same proportion of attention that teachers and writers often give them in the most respectable of classrooms and textbooks. This learned sense of moral proportion, coming from the apparent objectivity of the scholar, is accepted more easily than when it comes from politicians at press conferences. It is therefore more deadly.”
He conflates his opinion with fact here and goes off into rant. It’s sad this is considered a history book.
At least when I purchase Mark L3vin’s Unfreedom of the Press(available now on amazon and at your local retailers) I know I’m getting a political book with a heavy bias.