When we beat the bosses

cheryl

I started this.
Staff member
When we beat the bosses - Socialist Worker

On the 20th anniversary of the UPS strike, Lee Sustar looks back on the Teamsters' tremendous victory and its continuing significance for unions today.

IT WAS a risky strike that was bound to lose. That, at least, was the opinion of the bosses--and more than a few top union officials.

But when some 185,000 Teamsters union members took to the picket lines at United Parcel Service (UPS) on August 4, 1997, Corporate America was stunned, anti-union politicians were caught flat-footed, and working-class people across the U.S. embraced the struggle as their own.

"This isn't just about money," Mike, a part-time worker in Chicago, told Socialist Worker in an interview at a picket-line rally two days into the strike. "This is about taking care of your family, yourself, and making a better life for yourself and your family, and sending a message to these corporations that you cannot treat workers in America--and around the world--like this."
 

brownIEman

Well-Known Member
What a great idea another strike would be. That will show the company that it must compensate it's people fairly. Could probably even force them to dump another $6B into central states (since the wonderful folks managing that fund managed to lose the vast majority of the first $6B, which, BTW, UPS is still paying on).
When the '97 rolled around, the explosion in this industry due to e-retail was just getting going. So was UPS' serious competition. UPS was doing things such as consolidating the CSTCs and other operations to trim costs and try to remain competitive as it already was seeing its market share erode. The '97 contract from the UPS side was an attempt to control costs so it could remain competitive and gain back market share. In that sence, the union absolutely beat the boss, as they say, and UPS failed. Since the strike, two huge trends have continued unabated: The total package market has continued to explode, and UPS' share of that market has continued to shrink, from about 80% in '97 to about 24% today.
So yes, the union should go back to flexing its muscle and strike again next year. I mean, if we can get that market share down to 0%, that will REALLY show them, talk about beating the bosses!
 
A

Article 3

Guest
What a great idea another strike would be. That will show the company that it must compensate it's people fairly. Could probably even force them to dump another $6B into central states (since the wonderful folks managing that fund managed to lose the vast majority of the first $6B, which, BTW, UPS is still paying on).
When the '97 rolled around, the explosion in this industry due to e-retail was just getting going. So was UPS' serious competition. UPS was doing things such as consolidating the CSTCs and other operations to trim costs and try to remain competitive as it already was seeing its market share erode. The '97 contract from the UPS side was an attempt to control costs so it could remain competitive and gain back market share. In that sence, the union absolutely beat the boss, as they say, and UPS failed. Since the strike, two huge trends have continued unabated: The total package market has continued to explode, and UPS' share of that market has continued to shrink, from about 80% in '97 to about 24% today.
So yes, the union should go back to flexing its muscle and strike again next year. I mean, if we can get that market share down to 0%, that will REALLY show them, talk about beating the bosses!
Please list the volume delivered per company. I'll be waiting.

Does this include how much we dump into the Post office?
 

TearsInRain

IE boogeyman
Guess that leaves you out.
757.jpg
 
Top