you must have been a terrible loader if you let that happen to you
I didn't. But I was a preloader before these scanners were implemented.
you must have been a terrible loader if you let that happen to you
I choose to stack it out and stop the belt if necessary. I will not sacrifice load quality or safety
Huge deal at mine, too. We got a stern talking-to by our steward during safety last week. I guess they saw how terrible the end of 2nd and 3rd belt got, and went ballistic we couldn't reach fire exits or extinguisher units etc. Had a reminder every morning. Steward always asks now if we have enough room and if under the belts is staying clear. Then the sups say stop the belt if it happens then lose their minds when the belts stop. As long as the paycheck clears lmao.
Keep it up and they will let you take the route outI feel so bad man one driver let another driver take his route out because i loaded his car like im sure
As usual you have no clue. The reason is because the time allowances and time to do the loading don't change. Smhwhy would your load quality suffer from slowing down, that makes zero sense
why would your load quality suffer from slowing down, that makes zero sense
Stacking out is a huge safety issue for loaders at my center.
Our belt stops too often but somehow we get drivers out by 9am now. So far it's been Thursday Friday and today. I'm starting to think something is wrong.
As usual you have no clue. The reason is because the time allowances and time to do the loading don't change. Smh
Well actually I can think of a couple ways in which this would happen
So how does this revolutionary idea actualy sace us money? What because the drivers spend more time on tue road looking for crap? And eventually the preload start time will need to be pushed back to accommodate this technology. Also one last point lets not forget those whose name we never know...seasonals they need more time to be trained in order to keep up with the flow.
- Loader feels more rushed so therefore there is less focus on one aspect or another so load quality suffers.
- No "extra" time at the end because the loader is taking that last 15 minutes where they would close out and straighten the truck to clear the stack outs.
.you're wrong, when a site deploys smartscan, they do get extra time allowance for it
this shouldn't matter anyways as the load ALWAYS crushes it's PPH, it's the unload and sort that hold back a preload's PPH
smartscan has a 95% average reduction in misloads
Corporate IE agrees with you though, they want to nuke the program, despite that it frees up all the on roads to actually do their job and the preload sups don't have to chase misloads till 3pm anymore (hello 12 hour days)
lmao. How do you end up with more time to do it when you have exactly the same amount of time? Lol Wanna talk about time allowances? Surely notyou're wrong, when a site deploys smartscan, they do get extra time allowance for it
this shouldn't matter anyways as the load ALWAYS crushes it's PPH, it's the unload and sort that hold back a preload's PPH
smartscan has a 95% average reduction in misloads
Corporate IE agrees with you though, they want to nuke the program, despite that it frees up all the on roads to actually do their job and the preload sups don't have to chase misloads till 3pm anymore (hello 12 hour days)
We already do 12 hour daysyou're wrong, when a site deploys smartscan, they do get extra time allowance for it
this shouldn't matter anyways as the load ALWAYS crushes it's PPH, it's the unload and sort that hold back a preload's PPH
smartscan has a 95% average reduction in misloads
Corporate IE agrees with you though, they want to nuke the program, despite that it frees up all the on roads to actually do their job and the preload sups don't have to chase misloads till 3pm anymore (hello 12 hour days)
That's how all trucks are loaded now. Not the loaders fault.you must have been a terrible loader if you let that happen to you
Such a great feeling shutting the belt off when they're trying to shove it down your throat.I stopped it today cuz the new guy had two fire exits, the area along the belt, and under the belt crammed with packages falling off. Supes got mad we stopped it and the 4 of us went and cleaned his stuff up in a couple minutes. Management went ballistic, but hey, egress. As directed.
IE doesn't tell the Ops to understaff the load portion, they do that all by themselvesThat's how all trucks are loaded now. Not the loaders fault.
Too many packages coming down in too short of a time frame with not enough workers.
But IE says that's how it should be done so they continue to be set up to fail day after day.
How is this even possible? You have to unload and sort it before it gets to the loader?this shouldn't matter anyways as the load ALWAYS crushes it's PPH, it's the unload and sort that hold back a preload's PPH
Not necessarily. I remember many times where one of the belts feeding the different preload areas would shut off and we just kept sorting and stacking the packages up or throwing the boxes down the slide. More then once we had to take boxes off the belt because there was too much weight on the belt for it to start. Most guys in the unload had other day jobs and wanted off as early as possible to make it to work on time.How is this even possible? You have to unload and sort it before it gets to the loader?
That plus the fact that loaders with stacked out trucks and having to stop the belt constantly slows down the sort and the unload also