floridays
Well-Known Member
I simply wanted you to engage your brain.I have no idea where you're going with any of this and have no interest in trying to decipher cryptic messages. I try my best to answer whatever is asked of me but your stuff is oddball crap, either because you don't know any better or because you like to think you're being clever or something.
If you think the language of the RLA says something about this scenario one way or the other, quote the RLA language that says it. I've read a billion different "the RLA says" posts from people who can barely spell RLA, let alone who have read it and know what it says.
You have made it crystal clear you cannot think on your own unless you revert to your football comparisons.
I asked simple questions, answers which will never be forthcoming from you. You either aren't equipped to answer them or do not have the authorization to reply.
GENERAL PURPOSES SEC. 2. The purposes of the Act are: (1) To avoid any interruption to commerce or to the operation of any carrier engaged therein; (2) to forbid any limitation upon freedom of association among employees or any denial, as a condition of employment or other
wise, of the right of employees to join a labor organization; (3) to provide for the complete independence of carriers and of employees in the matter of self-organization to carry out the purposes of this Act; (4) to provide for the prompt and orderly settlement of all disputes concerning rates of pay, rules, or working conditions; (5) to provide for the prompt and orderly settlement of all disputes growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or working conditions. ø45 U.S.C. 151a
I can take your bony hand and walk you through it if needed.
You are too dense to understand no challenge has ever been offered to the designation, and I think it is clearly spelled out for you the exact purpose of the RLA.
I can take you to school if it's required by you.
I'll assume you are intelligent enough to read the statute and comprehend exactly what I have offered, and what Fedex's response would be and exactly what an order of a court would be when there is no officer or office to serve.
To be clear, I have said on numerous occasions the employees would not do that (refuse to report), it is like herding cats. That said if they did what is Fedex's recourse? Fire everyone that didnot report? Ask the court to make each employee to report, or just simmer while the hub and spoke disintegrates. You tell me.
When a corporation is paying 1,000 dollars for qualified referrals my assumption is they don't want qualified current employees refusing to report. Call me an idiot, call me whatever you'd like, act dumb like you do and just attack me, or ask your boss for the answer. You don't have the answer and you hope to hell the employees cannot be sheparded