SmithBarney
Well-Known Member
A 9lb letter? Its all crap anyway whoever stole it at ground is still a POS.That tracking info is for the tracking number on the letter. I'm betting the PS5 had a different tracking number
A 9lb letter? Its all crap anyway whoever stole it at ground is still a POS.That tracking info is for the tracking number on the letter. I'm betting the PS5 had a different tracking number
That's a power grab by those who want a centralized government. Let local government decide how best to allocate local tax funds for their particular circumstances. Not to mention the Federal government doesn't have the greatest track record for running anything.If a proposed special federal income tax surcharge say 5-10% over and above your total federal tax liability to be distributed to local law enforcement....would you agree to that? Yes or No?. No deflection...No side stepping....Flat out yes or no?
Typical Dimocrats solution.If a proposed special federal income tax surcharge say 5-10% over and above your total federal tax liability to be distributed to local law enforcement....would you agree to that? Yes or No?. No deflection...No side stepping....Flat out yes or no?
Trump spent like a drunken sailor and that’s okay? I mean if you’re gonna spend you need to pay for it. I could be wrongTypical Dimocrats solution.
Mores taxes.
“Trump spent like a drunken sailor and that’s okay? I mean if you’re gonna spend you need to pay for it. I could be wrong
We aren't talking about turning the whole force out to search the city for one guy who stole something from Target. We're talking about sending an officer to the store to arrest or cite the shoplifter that's already been detained by store security.It would appear that some people cannot accept or refuse to accept the decision on the part of law enforcement to dedicate it's scarce resources to the apprehension and persecution of the most violent and egregious crimes. I'm sure that law enforcement would indeed pursue much more aggressively lesser crimes if they're given the money and manpower in sufficient amounts to do so. But when there's only so much money to go around you use it where it will do the most good.
You do if you have bacha's intellect.You don't kneecap law enforcement by reducing budgets then claim they don't have the resources to pursue lesser crimes.
Of course not. That's beyond stupid. Are we to believe that the same people who defunded the cops are going to give them extra money via a new tax?If a proposed special federal income tax surcharge say 5-10% over and above your total federal tax liability to be distributed to local law enforcement....would you agree to that? Yes or No?. No deflection...No side stepping....Flat out yes or no?